Automotive & Transportation
Mon, August 11, 2025
[ Today @ 05:37 PM ]: LancasterOnline
[ Today @ 05:36 PM ]: WPIX New York City, NY
[ Today @ 02:36 PM ]: WFMZ-TV
[ Today @ 12:39 PM ]: The Center Square
[ Today @ 12:38 PM ]: Penn Live
[ Today @ 12:37 PM ]: Associated Press
[ Today @ 07:36 AM ]: Time Out
[ Today @ 03:36 AM ]: KTVU
[ Today @ 01:36 AM ]: Dayton Daily News
Sun, August 10, 2025
[ Yesterday Evening ]: New York Post
[ Yesterday Evening ]: Chicago Tribune
[ Yesterday Evening ]: Pennsylvania Capital-Star
[ Yesterday Evening ]: WDTN Dayton
[ Yesterday Afternoon ]: rnz
[ Yesterday Morning ]: KETV Omaha
[ Yesterday Morning ]: The Daily Star
Sat, August 9, 2025
[ Last Saturday ]: Toronto Star
[ Last Saturday ]: WSOC
[ Last Saturday ]: WHBF Davenport
[ Last Saturday ]: FOX 32
[ Last Saturday ]: Chicago Tribune
[ Last Saturday ]: Wyoming News
[ Last Saturday ]: Morning Call PA
[ Last Saturday ]: People
Fri, August 8, 2025
[ Last Friday ]: WHIO
[ Last Friday ]: WFMZ-TV
[ Last Friday ]: Philadelphia Inquirer
[ Last Friday ]: Channel NewsAsia Singapore
[ Last Friday ]: The Spokesman-Review
[ Last Friday ]: moneycontrol.com
[ Last Friday ]: Action News Jax
[ Last Friday ]: LancasterOnline
[ Last Friday ]: Cleveland.com
[ Last Friday ]: New York Post
[ Last Friday ]: The Citizen
[ Last Friday ]: Chicago Sun-Times
[ Last Friday ]: WDTN Dayton
[ Last Friday ]: WSFA
[ Last Friday ]: The Financial Express
[ Last Friday ]: Penn Live
[ Last Friday ]: East Bay Times
[ Last Friday ]: the-sun.com
[ Last Friday ]: The Spokesman-Review, Spokane, Wash.
[ Last Friday ]: Cleveland.com
[ Last Friday ]: WSMV
[ Last Friday ]: WDRB
Wed, August 6, 2025
[ Last Wednesday ]: 7News Miami
[ Last Wednesday ]: ThePrint
[ Last Wednesday ]: phillyvoice.com
[ Last Wednesday ]: New York Post
[ Last Wednesday ]: Cleveland.com
[ Last Wednesday ]: Honolulu Star-Advertiser
[ Last Wednesday ]: moneycontrol.com
Tue, August 5, 2025
[ Last Tuesday ]: WFMZ-TV
[ Last Tuesday ]: Chicago Tribune
[ Last Tuesday ]: Fox 13
[ Last Tuesday ]: rediff.com
[ Last Tuesday ]: Business Today
[ Last Tuesday ]: WDTN Dayton
Mon, August 4, 2025
[ Mon, Aug 04th ]: WFMZ-TV
[ Mon, Aug 04th ]: Dayton Daily News
[ Mon, Aug 04th ]: WILX-TV
[ Mon, Aug 04th ]: KETV Omaha
[ Mon, Aug 04th ]: Philadelphia Inquirer
[ Mon, Aug 04th ]: Chicago Tribune
Sun, August 3, 2025
[ Sun, Aug 03rd ]: WDRB
[ Sun, Aug 03rd ]: WTOP News
[ Sun, Aug 03rd ]: WFMZ-TV
[ Sun, Aug 03rd ]: Men's Journal
[ Sun, Aug 03rd ]: The Spokesman-Review
[ Sun, Aug 03rd ]: Orange County Register
[ Sun, Aug 03rd ]: ThePrint
[ Sun, Aug 03rd ]: The Straits Times
[ Sun, Aug 03rd ]: Local 12 WKRC Cincinnati
Sat, August 2, 2025
[ Sat, Aug 02nd ]: Time Out
[ Sat, Aug 02nd ]: Asia One
[ Sat, Aug 02nd ]: FOX 32
[ Sat, Aug 02nd ]: KETV Omaha
[ Sat, Aug 02nd ]: WSMV
[ Sat, Aug 02nd ]: Associated Press
[ Sat, Aug 02nd ]: Buffalo News
[ Sat, Aug 02nd ]: The New Zealand Herald
[ Sat, Aug 02nd ]: ThePrint
[ Sat, Aug 02nd ]: East Bay Times
[ Sat, Aug 02nd ]: Toronto Star
[ Sat, Aug 02nd ]: The Spokesman-Review
[ Sat, Aug 02nd ]: WSOC
[ Sat, Aug 02nd ]: WSFA
[ Sat, Aug 02nd ]: Cleveland.com
[ Sat, Aug 02nd ]: LancasterOnline
[ Sat, Aug 02nd ]: sportskeeda.com
[ Sat, Aug 02nd ]: news4sanantonio
[ Sat, Aug 02nd ]: Channel NewsAsia Singapore
[ Sat, Aug 02nd ]: Chicago Tribune
Thu, July 31, 2025
[ Thu, Jul 31st ]: WDTN Dayton
[ Thu, Jul 31st ]: WHIO
[ Thu, Jul 31st ]: The Honolulu Star-Advertiser
[ Thu, Jul 31st ]: New York Post
Wed, July 30, 2025
[ Wed, Jul 30th ]: New York Post
[ Wed, Jul 30th ]: WDTN Dayton
[ Wed, Jul 30th ]: Staten Island Advance
[ Wed, Jul 30th ]: Action News Jax
[ Wed, Jul 30th ]: WHBF Davenport
[ Wed, Jul 30th ]: Paul Tan
[ Wed, Jul 30th ]: Forbes
Tue, July 29, 2025
[ Tue, Jul 29th ]: WSOC
[ Tue, Jul 29th ]: WSFA
[ Tue, Jul 29th ]: East Bay Times
[ Tue, Jul 29th ]: Moneywise
[ Tue, Jul 29th ]: San Francisco Examiner
[ Tue, Jul 29th ]: WSMV
[ Tue, Jul 29th ]: NBC Chicago
[ Tue, Jul 29th ]: The New Indian Express
Mon, July 28, 2025
[ Mon, Jul 28th ]: Associated Press
[ Mon, Jul 28th ]: The New Zealand Herald
[ Mon, Jul 28th ]: Lowyat.net
[ Mon, Jul 28th ]: NY Daily News
[ Mon, Jul 28th ]: Chicago Tribune
[ Mon, Jul 28th ]: WSMV
[ Mon, Jul 28th ]: Philadelphia Inquirer
[ Mon, Jul 28th ]: Southern Living
Sun, July 27, 2025
[ Sun, Jul 27th ]: The Hans India
[ Sun, Jul 27th ]: Chicago Tribune
Fri, July 25, 2025
[ Fri, Jul 25th ]: The Hans India
[ Fri, Jul 25th ]: Channel NewsAsia Singapore
[ Fri, Jul 25th ]: Philadelphia Inquirer
[ Fri, Jul 25th ]: moneycontrol.com
[ Fri, Jul 25th ]: KETV Omaha
Thu, July 24, 2025
[ Thu, Jul 24th ]: Chicago Sun-Times
[ Thu, Jul 24th ]: The New Indian Express
Wed, July 23, 2025
[ Wed, Jul 23rd ]: Orange County Register
[ Wed, Jul 23rd ]: The Straits Times
[ Wed, Jul 23rd ]: The Spokesman-Review, Spokane, Wash.
Tue, July 22, 2025
[ Tue, Jul 22nd ]: WSFA
[ Tue, Jul 22nd ]: NY Daily News
[ Tue, Jul 22nd ]: CBS News
[ Tue, Jul 22nd ]: WFMZ-TV
[ Tue, Jul 22nd ]: USA TODAY
[ Tue, Jul 22nd ]: Dog Time
[ Tue, Jul 22nd ]: rediff.com
[ Tue, Jul 22nd ]: moneycontrol.com
[ Tue, Jul 22nd ]: The New Indian Express
Mon, July 21, 2025
[ Mon, Jul 21st ]: The News International
[ Mon, Jul 21st ]: The Hans India
[ Mon, Jul 21st ]: Time Out
[ Mon, Jul 21st ]: New York Post
[ Mon, Jul 21st ]: World Socialist Web Site
Sat, July 19, 2025
[ Sat, Jul 19th ]: Chicago Sun-Times
[ Sat, Jul 19th ]: FOX 32
[ Sat, Jul 19th ]: The Hans India
[ Sat, Jul 19th ]: yahoo.com
Fri, July 18, 2025
[ Fri, Jul 18th ]: The Straits Times
[ Fri, Jul 18th ]: CBS News
[ Fri, Jul 18th ]: Action News Jax
[ Fri, Jul 18th ]: Asia One
[ Fri, Jul 18th ]: The Irish News
[ Fri, Jul 18th ]: ABC 7 Chicago
[ Fri, Jul 18th ]: The Hans India
[ Fri, Jul 18th ]: Time Out
[ Fri, Jul 18th ]: WDRB
[ Fri, Jul 18th ]: WMBB Panama City
Thu, July 17, 2025
[ Thu, Jul 17th ]: LancasterOnline
[ Thu, Jul 17th ]: KETV Omaha
[ Thu, Jul 17th ]: WHIO
[ Thu, Jul 17th ]: Chattanooga Times Free Press
[ Thu, Jul 17th ]: Chicago Tribune
[ Thu, Jul 17th ]: Los Angeles Times Opinion
[ Thu, Jul 17th ]: Los Angeles Daily News
[ Thu, Jul 17th ]: NBC Chicago
[ Thu, Jul 17th ]: Philadelphia Inquirer
[ Thu, Jul 17th ]: The Financial Times
[ Thu, Jul 17th ]: WDIO
[ Thu, Jul 17th ]: Fox 23
[ Thu, Jul 17th ]: WTOP News
[ Thu, Jul 17th ]: The Messenger
[ Thu, Jul 17th ]: The Columbian
[ Thu, Jul 17th ]: NY Post Sports
[ Thu, Jul 17th ]: MLB
[ Thu, Jul 17th ]: Kyiv Independent
[ Thu, Jul 17th ]: SB Nation
[ Thu, Jul 17th ]: Pacific Daily News
[ Thu, Jul 17th ]: WESH
[ Thu, Jul 17th ]: Newsweek
[ Thu, Jul 17th ]: WSB Cox articles
[ Thu, Jul 17th ]: East Bay Times
[ Thu, Jul 17th ]: Wrestle Zone
[ Thu, Jul 17th ]: Us Weekly
[ Thu, Jul 17th ]: The Wrap
[ Thu, Jul 17th ]: Sports Illustrated
[ Thu, Jul 17th ]: KREX articles
[ Thu, Jul 17th ]: WITI
[ Thu, Jul 17th ]: National Hockey League
[ Thu, Jul 17th ]: NorthJersey.com
[ Thu, Jul 17th ]: The Boston Globe
[ Thu, Jul 17th ]: MLive
[ Thu, Jul 17th ]: The Hill
Letters to the Editor: Want to bolster DLTA? Make it easier for everyone else to get there
//automotive-transportation.news-articles.net/co .. ke-it-easier-for-everyone-else-to-get-there.html
Published in Automotive and Transportation on Thursday, July 17th 2025 at 19:36 GMT by Los Angeles Times Opinion🞛 This publication is a summary or evaluation of another publication 🞛 This publication contains editorial commentary or bias from the source
''The available public transit feels unsafe and unpleasant (and that''s putting it nicely),'' writes an L.A. Times reader.
The central argument of the letter is that the California High-Speed Rail project, which aims to connect major cities like San Francisco and Los Angeles with high-speed train service, has become a financial black hole. The author expresses skepticism about the project's ability to deliver on its promises, pointing to years of delays, cost overruns, and a lack of tangible progress. Initially envisioned as a transformative infrastructure project that would reduce traffic congestion, lower carbon emissions, and provide an alternative to air travel, the rail initiative has instead become a symbol of government inefficiency in the eyes of many critics, including the letter writer. The author highlights that billions of dollars have already been spent, with little to show for it in terms of completed tracks or operational trains. This frustration is compounded by the fact that the project's completion date continues to be pushed further into the future, with no clear end in sight.
In contrast, the author champions Delta Air Lines as a more deserving recipient of state support. Delta, as a major airline with a significant presence in California, contributes directly to the state's economy through job creation, tourism, and business connectivity. The letter suggests that investing in Delta—whether through subsidies, tax incentives, or infrastructure improvements at airports—would yield more immediate and measurable benefits for Californians. The author argues that air travel remains a critical mode of transportation for both residents and visitors, and supporting an established player like Delta would ensure the state remains competitive in the global economy. This perspective reflects a broader debate about whether public funds should prioritize existing, proven industries over speculative, long-term projects like high-speed rail.
Beyond the specific comparison between the rail project and Delta, the letter also touches on the opportunity costs of the high-speed rail initiative. The author questions what other priorities could be addressed with the billions of dollars funneled into the rail system. For instance, they suggest that funds could be used to improve existing public transportation systems, such as buses and regional trains, which serve a larger portion of the population on a daily basis. Additionally, the letter raises the possibility of directing resources toward education, healthcare, or housing—areas that many Californians see as more urgent than a futuristic train system that may not be completed for decades. This line of reasoning underscores a common critique of large-scale infrastructure projects: while they may have long-term benefits, they often come at the expense of more immediate needs that impact people's daily lives.
The tone of the letter is one of exasperation, reflecting a sentiment shared by many who have followed the high-speed rail saga over the years. The author uses the term "boondoggle" to describe the project, a word that conveys wastefulness and futility. This choice of language suggests a deep distrust in the government's ability to manage such an ambitious undertaking effectively. The letter implies that the project has become more about political posturing and legacy-building than about delivering practical solutions for the state's transportation challenges. By contrast, the author's advocacy for Delta Air Lines is framed as a pragmatic alternative, grounded in the realities of current economic and travel needs rather than speculative future benefits.
The letter also indirectly raises questions about the environmental arguments often used to justify the high-speed rail project. Proponents of the rail system frequently cite its potential to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by encouraging people to choose trains over cars or planes. However, the author of the letter appears unconvinced by this rationale, perhaps due to the project's slow progress and the significant environmental impact of its construction. While the letter does not delve deeply into this aspect, the implicit skepticism aligns with broader debates about whether the environmental benefits of high-speed rail are worth the financial and social costs, especially when compared to other green initiatives that could be funded instead.
Furthermore, the letter serves as a call to action for policymakers and the public to reevaluate the state's priorities. The author urges readers and leaders to consider whether continuing to pour money into the high-speed rail project is the best use of limited resources. By juxtaposing the struggling rail initiative with the potential to support a major airline like Delta, the letter challenges the narrative that the rail system is an inevitable or necessary investment. Instead, it suggests that there are alternative paths to achieving economic growth and improved transportation, paths that may be less flashy but more effective in the short term.
In a broader context, this letter reflects ongoing tensions in California and beyond about how to balance ambitious, forward-looking projects with the practical needs of the present. The high-speed rail project, first approved by voters in 2008, was initially met with enthusiasm as a bold vision for the future. However, as costs have ballooned and timelines have stretched, public support has waned, giving rise to voices like the one in this letter. The author's focus on Delta Air Lines as an alternative investment highlights a preference for supporting established industries that already play a vital role in the state's economy, rather than gambling on a project with uncertain outcomes.
The letter also taps into a sense of regional pride and concern for local economic stability. Delta Air Lines, with its extensive operations in California, is seen as a homegrown success story that deserves protection and encouragement. The author seems to view the airline as a more reliable partner in the state's economic future than a rail system that has yet to prove its worth. This perspective may resonate with readers who are weary of government overreach or mismanagement and who prefer to see public funds directed toward entities with a track record of delivering results.
In conclusion, the letter to the editor published on Yahoo News offers a scathing critique of California's high-speed rail project while advocating for increased support for Delta Air Lines as a more practical and immediate investment. The author expresses deep frustration with the rail initiative's cost overruns, delays, and lack of progress, labeling it a "boondoggle" that diverts resources from more pressing needs. By contrast, Delta is presented as a vital economic engine that could provide quicker returns on investment through job creation and enhanced connectivity. The letter also raises broader questions about the state's priorities, suggesting that funds could be better spent on existing transportation systems, education, healthcare, or housing. Ultimately, the piece serves as a passionate plea for pragmatism over idealism, urging policymakers to reconsider their commitment to a troubled project in favor of more tangible and immediate benefits for Californians. This perspective contributes to an ongoing public debate about the best way to allocate resources in a state facing numerous competing challenges and opportunities.
Read the Full Los Angeles Times Opinion Article at:
[ https://www.yahoo.com/news/letters-editor-want-bolster-dlta-150000536.html ]