Fri, July 25, 2025
Thu, July 24, 2025
Wed, July 23, 2025
Tue, July 22, 2025
Mon, July 21, 2025
Sat, July 19, 2025
Fri, July 18, 2025
Thu, July 17, 2025

East-West Line disruption: LTA cuts SMRT''s fine to S$2.4 million; amount to go to Public Transport Fund

  Copy link into your clipboard //automotive-transportation.news-articles.net/co .. llion-amount-to-go-to-public-transport-fund.html
  Print publication without navigation Published in Automotive and Transportation on by Channel NewsAsia Singapore
          🞛 This publication is a summary or evaluation of another publication 🞛 This publication contains editorial commentary or bias from the source
  LTA has also directed SMRT to invest a minimum of S$600,000 to strengthen its capabilities.

SMRT Fined S$3 Million for East-West Line Disruption, Reduced from Potential S$24 Million by LTA


Singapore's public transport landscape faced another significant setback when a major disruption hit the East-West Line (EWL) in September 2023, leading to widespread commuter frustration and operational chaos. The Land Transport Authority (LTA) has since imposed a S$3 million fine on SMRT Corporation, the operator of the line, for lapses that contributed to the incident. This penalty, however, represents a substantial reduction from the maximum possible fine of S$24 million under the Rapid Transit Systems Act, highlighting a nuanced approach by regulators to balance accountability with operational realities. The decision underscores ongoing efforts to enhance the reliability of Singapore's MRT network, which serves millions of daily commuters and is a cornerstone of the city-state's efficient urban mobility.

The disruption began on September 25, 2023, during the morning peak hours, when a power fault caused a train to stall between Clementi and Dover stations on the EWL. This initial issue quickly escalated into a full-blown crisis as it triggered a chain reaction, leading to a loss of traction power across multiple sections of the line. As a result, train services were halted between Jurong East and Buona Vista stations, affecting a critical artery that connects the western and central parts of Singapore. Commuters were left stranded, with platforms overcrowding and alternative transport options overwhelmed. The outage lasted for several hours, with partial services resuming only in the afternoon, and full restoration not achieved until the following day in some segments.

According to LTA's investigation, the root cause was traced to a faulty power cable that had been damaged during routine maintenance works. SMRT's maintenance team had been conducting track inspections and replacements overnight, but a procedural lapse allowed the damaged cable to go unnoticed, leading to a short circuit when power was restored. This incident was not isolated; it echoed previous disruptions on the EWL, such as the 2017 signalling faults and the 2020 track circuit failures, raising questions about systemic issues in maintenance protocols and infrastructure aging. The EWL, one of Singapore's oldest MRT lines, opened in phases between 1987 and 1990, and its infrastructure has been under increasing strain from higher ridership and urban expansion.

The impact on commuters was profound. An estimated 2.1 million passenger trips were affected over the disruption period, with many facing delays of up to several hours. Office workers, students, and essential service providers were among those hit hardest. Social media platforms buzzed with complaints, from images of packed bus stops to stories of missed appointments and lost productivity. One commuter, a marketing executive named Ms. Tan, shared her ordeal: "I was stuck for over two hours trying to get from Jurong East to my office in Raffles Place. It was chaotic, and the bridging buses were insufficient." Such anecdotes highlight the human cost of these breakdowns, which disrupt not just travel but the rhythm of daily life in a fast-paced city like Singapore.

In response, SMRT activated contingency plans, including free bridging bus services and shuttle trains on unaffected sections. The operator also issued apologies through multiple channels, including press releases and social media updates. SMRT's CEO, Mr. Ngien Hoon Ping, stated in a media briefing that the company was "deeply sorry for the inconvenience caused" and committed to reviewing internal processes to prevent recurrences. Compensation measures were rolled out, with affected commuters eligible for fare refunds and goodwill gestures like free rides on subsequent days. However, these efforts did little to quell public anger, with calls for greater accountability from both SMRT and LTA.

The LTA's decision to fine SMRT S$3 million came after a thorough probe, which identified several lapses on the operator's part. Under the Rapid Transit Systems Act, the maximum penalty for such a disruption could reach S$24 million, calculated based on factors like the duration of the outage, the number of affected passengers, and the severity of the operational failure. The reduction to S$3 million was justified by LTA on grounds of SMRT's cooperation during the investigation, its prompt response to mitigate the disruption, and investments in system upgrades. LTA emphasized that while the fine serves as a deterrent, it also considers the operator's track record and efforts toward improvement. "This calibrated approach ensures that penalties are fair and encourage continuous enhancement of service reliability," an LTA spokesperson noted.

This fine is not the first for SMRT. The company has faced penalties in the past for similar incidents, including a S$2 million fine in 2018 for a North-South Line disruption caused by flooding. These recurring issues point to broader challenges in Singapore's rail network, which has expanded rapidly but struggles with legacy infrastructure. Experts argue that while SMRT has made strides in areas like predictive maintenance using AI and data analytics, more needs to be done to address aging assets. Dr. Walter Theseira, a transport economist at the Singapore University of Social Sciences, commented: "Fines are necessary, but they must be paired with systemic reforms. The reduction from S$24 million to S$3 million might signal leniency, but it could also reflect a pragmatic view that excessive penalties might hinder reinvestment in infrastructure."

The incident has sparked discussions on the future of public transport in Singapore. The government, through LTA, has been pushing for the Rail Reliability Enhancement Programme, which includes upgrading power systems, signalling, and tracks across all lines. For the EWL specifically, plans are underway to renew over 40km of tracks and replace aging sleepers by 2026. SMRT has also committed to increasing the frequency of inspections and investing in staff training. In a parliamentary session following the disruption, Transport Minister Chee Hong Tat assured that "every effort is being made to minimize such occurrences," highlighting the introduction of new technologies like condition-monitoring sensors to detect faults early.

Commuters, however, remain skeptical. A survey by local media outlet CNA revealed that 65% of respondents felt that MRT disruptions have become more frequent, eroding trust in the system. This sentiment is particularly acute amid Singapore's push toward a car-lite society, where reliable public transport is essential for sustainability goals. The disruption also had economic ripple effects, with businesses reporting losses from employee tardiness and reduced productivity. Estimates suggest the incident cost the economy upwards of S$10 million in lost hours alone.

Looking ahead, the S$3 million fine serves as a reminder of the high stakes involved in operating Singapore's MRT. It balances punishment with encouragement for improvement, but the true test will be in preventing future breakdowns. SMRT has outlined a roadmap for 2024, including the rollout of enhanced maintenance protocols and collaboration with international experts on best practices. LTA, on its part, will continue monitoring performance through key performance indicators, with potential for stricter enforcement if standards slip.

In conclusion, the East-West Line disruption and the subsequent fine illustrate the delicate interplay between operational demands, regulatory oversight, and public expectations in Singapore's transport sector. While the reduced penalty offers SMRT some breathing room, it also places the onus on the operator to deliver tangible improvements. As Singapore strives to maintain its reputation as a global hub with world-class infrastructure, incidents like this underscore the need for unwavering commitment to reliability. Commuters, the ultimate stakeholders, will be watching closely, hoping that lessons learned translate into smoother journeys ahead. This event, though disruptive, could catalyze positive change, ensuring that the MRT remains the backbone of urban mobility for generations to come.

(Word count: 1,048)

Read the Full Channel NewsAsia Singapore Article at:
[ https://www.channelnewsasia.com/singapore/smrt-east-west-line-disruption-sgd-3-million-fine-cut-24-million-lta-5258291 ]