N※N

Public outcry against proposed cuts to Chicago-area transit system

The Escalating Crisis in Ukraine: Imperialist Machinations and the Specter of Nuclear War

In a scathing analysis published on the World Socialist Web Site, the ongoing conflict in Ukraine is dissected not merely as a regional dispute but as a manifestation of deeper imperialist rivalries that threaten to engulf the world in catastrophe. The article, dated May 9, 2025, commemorates the 80th anniversary of the Soviet victory over Nazi Germany in World War II, drawing stark parallels between the historical defeat of fascism and the contemporary resurgence of militarism under the guise of defending "democracy." It argues that the NATO-backed proxy war against Russia in Ukraine is not an isolated event but a critical juncture in the breakdown of the post-World War II global order, driven by the insatiable drive of US imperialism to maintain hegemony amid its economic decline.

The piece begins by recounting the historical significance of May 9, known as Victory Day in Russia and the former Soviet republics. It highlights how the Red Army's triumph in 1945, at the cost of over 27 million Soviet lives, represented the pinnacle of the international working class's struggle against fascism. However, the authors contend that this victory has been systematically distorted and erased in Western narratives, particularly in the context of the current war. They point to recent actions by Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky's regime, which has banned Victory Day celebrations and equated Soviet symbols with those of Nazism, as evidence of a deliberate historical revisionism aimed at rehabilitating fascist collaborators like Stepan Bandera. This, the article asserts, is not accidental but part of a broader NATO strategy to provoke Russia and justify endless military escalation.

Delving into the geopolitical underpinnings, the analysis critiques the role of the United States and its NATO allies in engineering the conflict. It traces the origins back to the 2014 US-orchestrated coup in Kiev, which installed a far-right government hostile to Russia and its ethnic Russian population in eastern Ukraine. The article cites declassified documents and statements from US officials, such as Victoria Nuland's infamous involvement in the Maidan protests, to illustrate how Washington has long viewed Ukraine as a strategic pawn to encircle and weaken Russia. The expansion of NATO eastward, in violation of post-Cold War assurances, is portrayed as a deliberate provocation, culminating in the 2022 Russian invasion, which the authors describe as a reactionary response to genuine security threats but ultimately serving the interests of the Putin oligarchy rather than the Russian working class.

A central theme is the hypocrisy of Western imperialism's "rules-based order." The article lambasts the Biden administration's rhetoric of defending Ukrainian sovereignty while simultaneously supporting Israel's actions in Gaza, which it equates to genocide. It draws connections between the two conflicts, noting how US arms shipments to both Ukraine and Israel drain resources from domestic social programs, exacerbating inequality and fueling domestic unrest. The piece references recent protests on US college campuses against the Gaza war, interpreting them as signs of growing anti-war sentiment among youth, which the ruling class seeks to suppress through McCarthyite smears of "anti-Semitism" and police crackdowns.

Economically, the analysis frames the war as a symptom of capitalism's terminal crisis. With the US national debt surpassing $34 trillion and inflation eroding living standards, the turn to war is seen as a desperate measure to externalize internal contradictions. The article quotes Marxist theorists like Leon Trotsky to argue that imperialism is the highest stage of capitalism, where rival powers compete for markets and resources through military means. In this context, Russia's invasion is critiqued not from a pro-NATO perspective but as the action of a capitalist regime born from the Stalinist betrayal of the October Revolution and the subsequent restoration of capitalism in 1991. Putin's government, it argues, represents the interests of a corrupt oligarchy that has plundered the Soviet economy, leaving workers impoverished while enriching a tiny elite.

The specter of nuclear war looms large in the discussion. The article warns that recent escalations—such as the US authorization for Ukraine to use long-range missiles against Russian territory and Russia's tactical nuclear drills—bring humanity to the brink of Armageddon. It recalls the Cuban Missile Crisis of 1962 as a historical precedent, emphasizing that today's crisis is even more dangerous due to the proliferation of nuclear arsenals and the erosion of diplomatic channels. The authors criticize the pseudo-left parties and media outlets that downplay these risks, accusing them of aligning with imperialism under the banner of "human rights." Figures like Bernie Sanders and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez are singled out for their support of NATO funding, which the piece claims exposes their role as appendages of the Democratic Party's war machine.

Shifting to the international dimension, the article examines how the Ukraine war intersects with the US-China rivalry. It posits that the conflict is a rehearsal for a potential confrontation with China over Taiwan, with the US seeking to weaken Russia as a prelude to isolating Beijing. The economic decoupling from Russia, through sanctions and the seizure of assets, is analyzed as a model for future actions against China, potentially leading to a global economic fracture. The piece highlights the devastating human cost in Ukraine, with estimates of over 500,000 casualties on both sides, and condemns the forced conscription policies that treat soldiers as cannon fodder in a war of attrition.

On the home front, the analysis connects the war to the assault on democratic rights. It discusses the suppression of anti-war voices, such as the banning of the Russian socialist website in several countries and the persecution of figures like Julian Assange, as evidence of a turn toward authoritarianism. The article argues that the ruling classes, facing mass opposition to endless war and austerity, are preparing dictatorial measures to maintain control. This is exemplified by the rise of far-right movements in Europe, such as Germany's AfD and France's National Rally, which capitalize on anti-immigrant sentiment while the establishment parties pursue militarist policies.

The piece calls for a revolutionary response, rooted in the traditions of international socialism. It urges the building of an anti-war movement based on the working class, independent of bourgeois parties and trade union bureaucracies that have collaborated in war efforts. Drawing on the legacy of the Fourth International, founded by Trotsky, the authors advocate for the unification of workers across national boundaries to oppose imperialism and fight for socialism. They reference recent strikes in the US auto industry and global protests against inequality as embryonic forms of this struggle, emphasizing the need for a political program that exposes the capitalist roots of war.

In conclusion, the article posits that the Ukraine crisis is not an aberration but the inevitable outcome of a decaying capitalist system. Without a socialist revolution, it warns, humanity faces the dual threats of nuclear annihilation and fascist reaction. The path forward lies in mobilizing the international working class against all factions of the ruling elite, from Washington to Moscow, to establish a world planned economy based on human need rather than profit. This extensive critique serves as a clarion call, reminding readers that the lessons of May 9, 1945, demand not nostalgic commemoration but active struggle against the forces that perpetuate war and exploitation. (Word count: 1,048)

Read the Full World Socialist Web Site Article at:
[ https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2025/05/09/ltar-m09.html ]