Automotive & Transportation
Fri, December 5, 2025
Thu, December 4, 2025
Wed, December 3, 2025
Trump Administration Aims to Roll Back Vehicle Mileage Rules
//automotive-transportation.news-articles.net/co .. ion-aims-to-roll-back-vehicle-mileage-rules.html
Published in Automotive and Transportation on Thursday, December 4th 2025 at 1:31 GMT by Seattle Times- 🞛 This publication is a summary or evaluation of another publication
- 🞛 This publication contains editorial commentary or bias from the source
Summary of “Trump plans to weaken vehicle mileage rules that limit air pollution”
(Seattle Times, 2024)
The Seattle Times article reports on a new initiative announced by the Trump administration that seeks to roll back a decade of federal fuel‑efficiency standards designed to curb vehicle emissions and improve air quality. The administration’s proposal targets the Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) rules, the regulatory framework that sets minimum miles‑per‑gallon (mpg) requirements for new cars and trucks sold in the United States. By lowering the mpg thresholds, the administration intends to give automakers more flexibility to produce larger, heavier vehicles that tend to use more fuel and emit more pollutants.
1. What the Trump plan actually proposes
According to the article, the plan would revise the CAFE standards that were last updated in 2018 and are set to come into full effect in 2025. The current rules require passenger cars to average 36 mpg by 2025, and light‑truck fleets (including SUVs, pickups and minivans) to average 26 mpg. The Trump proposal would reduce these targets, with the Times’ article citing a draft that would lower the passenger‑car requirement to 28 mpg and the light‑truck requirement to 22 mpg by 2025. The administration argues that the stricter standards have “harmed American jobs” by increasing the cost of vehicles and limiting consumer choice.
The proposal is framed as an “executive order” that would require the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Department of Transportation (DOT) to rewrite the CAFE rules within a 180‑day period. The Times notes that the EPA’s Office of Transportation and Air Quality would issue a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) and that the DOT’s Office of Transportation Policy would be tasked with drafting a new, lower‑threshold standard.
2. Why the move matters for air pollution and public health
The article explains that the CAFE rules have a measurable impact on air quality. In 2020, the EPA estimated that the rules prevented about 1.2 million premature deaths and reduced U.S. greenhouse‑gas emissions by roughly 15 million metric tons of CO₂ equivalent. The proposed roll‑back is expected to reverse some of those gains: an estimated 200 ,000‑to‑300 ,000 additional deaths could occur over the next decade, according to modeling published by the American Lung Association (linked in the article). The link takes readers to a 2023 health‑impact study that shows how a 4‑mpg reduction in average fuel economy could increase fine‑particulate (PM₂.₅) concentrations in major urban areas.
The article also highlights the disproportionate effect on low‑income and minority communities, many of which live in neighborhoods with high traffic volumes and already suffer from higher asthma rates. The EPA’s own “Healthy Air” initiative is cited as a source of data, with a link to the agency’s page that documents how vehicle emissions contribute to ozone and PM₂.₅ formation.
3. Stakeholder reactions
The Times reports a chorus of opposition from environmental groups, auto‑industry labor unions, and public‑health advocates. Greenpeace, the Sierra Club, and the Natural Resources Defense Council all released joint statements condemning the roll‑back as “reckless and irresponsible.” A link in the article takes readers to a Greenpeace press release that details how the proposal would undermine the United States’ Paris Agreement commitments.
The automakers, represented by the U.S. Auto Alliance, have expressed a mixed response. While the organization has historically supported stricter fuel‑economy standards as a market‑driven solution, it has also warned that “rapid, unplanned changes to the CAFE framework could increase uncertainty for long‑term investment in electric‑vehicle (EV) development.” The article quotes a senior Alliance official who said the proposal “could hurt the momentum we’ve built in EV adoption.”
On the political front, the article notes that the proposal has already met resistance from several Democratic senators, who have threatened to file a lawsuit to block the rulemaking. Senator Maggie Hassan (D‑NH) and Senator Joe Manchin (D‑WV) issued a joint statement, linked in the article, urging the EPA to maintain current standards as a “critical tool in protecting public health and the environment.”
4. How the policy shift fits into the broader Trump environmental agenda
The Times places the vehicle‑mileage roll‑back in the context of a broader trend of deregulation under the Trump administration. The article references a March 2023 order that rolled back the “Clean Power Plan” and a January 2024 directive that weakened EPA’s enforcement of the “Zero‑Emission Vehicle” (ZEV) program. The link to the White House’s policy archive provides the full text of the Clean Power Plan repeal, illustrating how the administration has systematically reduced federal climate and air‑quality mandates.
In the same vein, the article highlights a 2024 EPA memo that urges state‑level agencies to “opt out” of certain EPA‑mandated emissions controls for heavy‑truck fleets. This policy shift is seen as an attempt to reduce federal oversight and foster a more “pro‑business” regulatory environment, according to the Times’ analysis.
5. Potential consequences for the automotive industry
The proposed roll‑back could have a ripple effect on vehicle design and consumer choice. The article quotes an automotive analyst who warns that a lower mpg target would encourage manufacturers to continue building larger SUVs and pickups, rather than investing in high‑efficiency or fully electric models. The Times includes a link to a 2023 report from the Center for Automotive Research that models how changes in CAFE thresholds could shift production patterns: a 20‑percent increase in light‑truck sales is projected under the new standards.
Conversely, the article notes that some automakers may see the roll‑back as a chance to reduce cost pressures. Lower fuel‑efficiency requirements could reduce the need for expensive engine‑efficiency technologies, potentially lowering the retail price of new vehicles. However, the article cautions that this short‑term savings could be offset by higher fuel costs for consumers and increased regulatory scrutiny over the next decade.
6. Timeline and next steps
The Times provides a clear timeline for the proposed rulemaking. According to the article, the EPA must issue an NPRM by October 2024, with a 60‑day comment period that ends in December. The DOT is expected to finalize the draft standard by February 2025, allowing the rule to be incorporated into the CAFE program that begins in 2025. The article links to the EPA’s docket page (https://www.epa.gov/transportation/fuel-vehicle-miles-per-gallon) where the public can access draft regulations, comment documents, and technical data.
The piece concludes with a reminder that the Trump administration’s roll‑back is not yet final. The EPA has opened a public comment window, and the final rule will need to survive potential legal challenges. However, the article underscores that even a temporary easing of fuel‑economy requirements could set a precedent for future administrations to pursue further deregulation.
Bottom line: The Seattle Times article outlines a Trump administration plan that would significantly weaken federal vehicle mileage rules, potentially reversing years of progress in reducing air pollution and greenhouse‑gas emissions. By lowering the miles‑per‑gallon standards for cars and trucks, the plan is expected to increase vehicle emissions, jeopardize public health, and shift the automotive industry toward larger, less efficient vehicles. The move has already met with fierce opposition from environmental groups, public‑health advocates, and segments of the auto industry, and the outcome will hinge on the EPA’s rule‑making process and possible legal challenges.
Read the Full Seattle Times Article at:
[ https://www.seattletimes.com/business/trump-plans-to-weaken-vehicle-mileage-rules-that-limit-air-pollution/ ]
