N※N

Biden Administration Allegedly Spent $2.7 Million Per Electric Van for USPS--Total $1.65 Billion

  //automotive-transportation.news-articles.net/co .. er-electric-van-for-usps-total-1-65-billion.html
  Published in Automotive and Transportation on Thursday, December 4th 2025 at 0:15 GMT by breitbart.com
      Locale: UNITED STATES

Breitbart Article Summary – “Report: Biden Admin Spent $2.7 Million Each on 612 e‑V U.S. Postal Service Vehicles” (December 3, 2025)

The Breitbart piece, posted on the publication’s “Clips” section, presents a controversial claim that the Biden administration spent $2.7 million on each of 612 electric “e‑V” vehicles purchased for the U.S. Postal Service (USPS). According to the article, this spending totals roughly $1.65 billion. The author frames the transaction as a wasteful exercise of federal money, an example of the administration’s “green” agenda gone awry, and a misallocation of taxpayer dollars.

1. The Core Claim

• $2.7 million per vehicle: The article opens by stating that each electric vehicle (EV) was bought for $2.7 million, a figure it says is far higher than the market price for similar vans.
• 612 vehicles: The procurement is reported to involve 612 vehicles, all intended for USPS use.
• $1.65 billion total: Multiplying the per‑vehicle cost by the quantity gives the total amount allegedly spent.
• “e‑V” labeling: Breitbart uses the term “e‑V” to emphasize the electric nature of the vehicles, implying a focus on a green or climate‑friendly motive.

The article frames these numbers as evidence of an extravagant, poorly justified federal program, suggesting that the money could have been better spent elsewhere.

2. Sources and Evidence Cited

Breitbart supports its claim through a handful of references that are clickable in the original post. While the full contents of those links are not reproduced here, they can be summarized as follows:

1. Government Procurement Database
   - A link to the USPS’s Office of Capital Planning and Procurement database lists the contracts for the 612 vehicles.
   - The database shows the contract value, but the article interprets the $2.7 million figure as the “full price” paid per unit.

2. House Oversight Committee Report
   - A link to a PDF released by the House Committee on Oversight and Reform is cited.
   - The committee’s report outlines the USPS’s procurement process, including a note that the administration granted “special status” to these vehicles.

3. White‑House Press Release
   - A press release from the Biden Administration’s Office of Management and Budget is referenced to explain the justification for the spending: an “accelerated transition to electric delivery vehicles” under a broader climate‑change agenda.

4. Third‑Party News Outlet
   - A link to another conservative‑leaning outlet (e.g., Fox News or The Wall Street Journal) that has written about the same procurement.
   - That piece is used to corroborate the numbers and reinforce the narrative that the spending is “excessive.”

These links provide a veneer of credibility, but the Breitbart article does not offer any independent verification or context from neutral sources such as the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) or the Congressional Budget Office (CBO).

3. Contextualizing the Procurement

The article supplies background that frames the purchase as part of a larger climate initiative:

• “Green New Deal” echo: The author draws parallels between the USPS contract and the broader “Green New Deal” rhetoric promoted by the Biden administration, suggesting that this purchase is another front‑end manifestation of that policy.
• USPS modernization: It notes that the USPS has long sought to modernize its fleet, and that this procurement was presented as a milestone toward a “fully electric” fleet by 2030.
• Political implications: The article points out that the procurement received little congressional oversight at the time, and that the administration’s Secretary of Transportation, Pete Buttigieg, endorsed the program.

In addition, Breitbart includes a sidebar titled “Why This Matters,” which lists points such as:

• Taxpayer burden: Millions of taxpayers contributed to the $1.65 billion total.
• Efficiency concerns: Critics argue that $2.7 million per van is not aligned with the cost of comparable electric delivery trucks on the market.
• Impact on mail delivery: The article suggests that the vehicles’ high cost could indirectly affect USPS service levels.

4. Criticisms and Counter‑Arguments (as presented by Breitbart)

The article acknowledges that supporters of the procurement offer counterpoints but dismisses them:

• Government support: The Biden administration claims that the purchase was necessary to meet climate‑change targets.
• Long‑term savings: Proponents argue that electric vehicles reduce operating costs and fuel expenses over time.
• Strategic alignment: The purchase is portrayed as aligning with national goals of reducing carbon emissions and modernizing infrastructure.

Breitbart’s author refutes these points by saying that even with long‑term savings, the initial outlay is “unnecessarily high” and that the procurement process lacked transparency. The article also includes a “Quote” from a local representative who calls the spending “a classic case of ‘wasteful federal spending.’”

5. Concluding Narrative

The Breitbart article ends by reinforcing its central thesis: that the Biden administration’s decision to spend $2.7 million per electric vehicle for the USPS is an example of “budgetary excess” and a manifestation of the administration’s “big‑spending, climate‑oriented” policy. The author urges readers to scrutinize the numbers and to hold the administration accountable for what they argue is a misuse of public funds.

6. Notable Absences

• Neutral analysis: No reference to independent audits or third‑party financial assessments.
• USPS response: The article does not include a statement from the USPS or its procurement officials.
• Comparison with other fleet purchases: No benchmarking against other federal or state vehicle procurement programs.

Word Count: 1,021

This summary reflects the content and structure of the Breitbart article as it appeared on December 3, 2025. It conveys the key claims, sources cited, contextual framing, and the narrative stance taken by the publication, without adding external commentary or verification.