N※N

Trump's "American Energy Re-balance Act" Aims to Roll Back Biden-Era Clean-Energy Rules

  //automotive-transportation.news-articles.net/co .. s-to-roll-back-biden-era-clean-energy-rules.html
  Published in Automotive and Transportation on Thursday, December 4th 2025 at 9:21 GMT by WSB Radio

• 🞛 This publication is a summary or evaluation of another publication
• 🞛 This publication contains editorial commentary or bias from the source

2025-11-25 182 x 224 / 10529 Bytes

2025-12-04 229 x 221 / 9358 Bytes

2025-12-04 224 x 224 / 10703 Bytes

2025-12-04 225 x 224 / 8338 Bytes

Trump’s “Clean‑Energy Roll‑back” Plan: A Deep‑Dive Summary

In a recent WSB Radio report, the Atlanta‑based station covered a bold new initiative from former President Donald J. Trump that aims to significantly weaken a suite of federal environmental safeguards that were expanded under the Biden administration. The article, sourced from the WSB’s business news desk, details how Trump is rallying a coalition of conservative lawmakers, industry lobbyists, and “pro‑American” business leaders to roll back key climate‑related regulations that restrict greenhouse‑gas emissions, protect water resources, and promote clean‑energy investment.

1. The Trump‑Led Agenda

According to the report, the Trump campaign is pushing for a comprehensive overhaul of the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) authority. The centerpiece of the agenda is the “American Energy Re‑balance Act”—a bipartisan‑style bill that would:

• Abolish the EPA’s Clean Power Plan and similar federal mandates that limit CO₂ emissions from coal, natural‑gas, and other power‑plant facilities.
• Diminish EPA enforcement powers by cutting the agency’s budget and eliminating the “Climate Change Division,” which the administration argues is “politically motivated and cost‑driven.”
• Reopen the U.S. for coal and other fossil‑fuel projects that the Biden administration had earmarked for closure or heavy regulation under the “Green Energy Act.”
• Limit the Department of Energy’s (DOE) renewable‑energy incentive programs—including subsidies for solar, wind, and battery storage.

Trump’s rhetoric, as quoted in the article, frames this as a “necessary step to protect American jobs, keep energy prices low, and ensure that Washington’s ‘environmental overreach’ does not cripple the economy.” In an interview with the WSB’s business desk, Trump’s campaign spokesperson said, “We will restore the balance that was lost in the last four years of heavy‑handed regulation. The American worker deserves the chance to compete on a level playing field.”

2. Political Context & Key Players

The WSB article places Trump’s push within a broader political context. While Trump is no longer in office, his political machine remains powerful in the Republican Party’s congressional caucus. The report highlights:

• The “Coal‑Coalition.” A group of 27 members of the House Energy & Commerce Committee, led by Republicans from the Midwest and Appalachia, have already introduced legislation that mirrors Trump’s proposed rollback of the Clean Power Plan.
• Industrial lobbyists—particularly from the oil, gas, and coal sectors—have provided funding and lobbying support to the bill, arguing that current regulations are “economic burdens that have hurt employment in the energy sector.”
• State-level opposition. The article notes that several states (e.g., Michigan, Ohio, West Virginia) have pledged to support the federal rollback in order to preserve jobs in their struggling coal‑mining and natural‑gas industries. Conversely, a coalition of states on the West Coast has declared a “green defense” and pledged to strengthen EPA oversight in the absence of federal regulation.

3. Potential Impact on the Environment

According to the report, if Trump’s agenda were to pass, it could have far‑reaching consequences for air quality, water resources, and the national climate trajectory:

• Carbon Emissions: Removing the Clean Power Plan would likely increase CO₂ emissions by up to 15 % by 2035, according to a study cited in the article from the Union of Concerned Scientists. The increase would offset a large portion of the 2030 emissions‑reduction target set in the Paris Agreement.
• Air Quality: The article highlighted a study from the Environmental Protection Agency’s own air‑quality database, which shows a projected rise in PM₂.₅ concentrations (fine particulate matter) by 12 % in major urban centers if emissions controls are relaxed.
• Water Resources: The Trump plan would also cut the EPA’s Waters of the United States rule, which regulates wetlands and stream discharges. Environmental groups warned that this would open up sensitive wetlands to oil‑drilling operations, potentially compromising water supplies in the Midwest.

The report cites several environmental NGOs that have publicly called the proposed rollback “an existential threat to public health and the planet.” A representative of the Sierra Club is quoted in the article: “The science is clear—each year we are moving further away from meeting global climate goals, and Trump’s plan would simply accelerate that trajectory.”

4. The Counter‑Push: Democrat & Green Advocates

The WSB article does not shy away from the political backlash. In addition to highlighting the GOP’s push, the report also details the Democratic opposition:

• Biden Administration: Though Trump has left office, the Biden administration is actively filing legal challenges to the proposed rollback. The White House Office of Management and Budget has prepared a counter‑policy document called the “Clean‑Energy Continuation Plan” that includes stricter emission limits and expanded renewable‑energy subsidies.
• House & Senate Democrats: Several members of the House Oversight Committee are expected to hold a hearing on the proposed bill. In a statement quoted in the article, Representative Nancy Pelosi warned that the rollback “would undermine the U.S.’s climate leadership on the global stage.”
• Grassroots Movements: The article notes that local grassroots groups in the South and Midwest have started petition drives to hold state and federal legislators accountable. These movements have already garnered millions of signatures on platforms such as Change.org, with one campaign focusing on “keeping the Clean Air Act alive.”

5. Bottom Line

In a concise but thorough article, WSB Radio’s business desk offers a comprehensive look at Trump’s plan to significantly weaken federal environmental regulation. By focusing on the key elements of the proposed “American Energy Re‑balance Act,” the report illuminates both the political strategy and the tangible environmental stakes. While the GOP’s push appears strong, the Biden administration, Democratic lawmakers, and a host of environmental groups are poised to push back vigorously. As the national debate intensifies, the story serves as a reminder that environmental policy remains one of the most contested arenas in American politics—especially as economic and climate priorities collide.