Fri, July 4, 2025
Thu, July 3, 2025
[ Yesterday Morning ]: AFP
Trump shows off giant new flagpoles
Wed, July 2, 2025
Tue, July 1, 2025
Mon, June 30, 2025
[ Last Monday ]: BGR
New on Peacock: July 2025
Sun, June 29, 2025
Sat, June 28, 2025
Fri, June 27, 2025
Thu, June 26, 2025
Wed, June 25, 2025
Tue, June 24, 2025

Over 170 charities call for end to deadly new Gaza aid distribution system


  Copy link into your clipboard //automotive-transportation.news-articles.net/co .. -to-deadly-new-gaza-aid-distribution-system.html
  Print publication without navigation Published in Automotive and Transportation on by Reuters
          🞛 This publication is a summary or evaluation of another publication 🞛 This publication contains editorial commentary or bias from the source


  GENEVA (Reuters) -More than 170 non-governmental organisations called on Tuesday for a U.S.- and Israeli-backed food aid distribution scheme in Gaza to be dismantled over concerns it is putting civilians at risk of death and injury. More than 500 people have been killed in mass shootings near aid distribution centres or transport routes guarded by Israeli forces since the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation started operating in late May, according to medical authorities in Gaza. The GHF uses private U.S. security and logistics companies to get supplies into Gaza, largely bypassing a U.N.-led system that Israel says had let militants divert aid.

The article titled "Over 170 Charities Call for End to 'Cruel' Asylum Policies" published on Yahoo News discusses a significant collective action by over 170 charities and organizations urging the UK government to reconsider and end what they describe as "cruel" asylum policies. The call to action was spearheaded by the Together With Refugees coalition, which includes prominent organizations such as Amnesty International, the Refugee Council, and Oxfam. The coalition's primary demand is for the UK government to establish a fair and effective asylum system that aligns with the country's humanitarian values and international obligations.

The article delves into the specifics of the criticized policies, notably the Rwanda deportation plan, which has been a focal point of contention. Under this plan, the UK government intends to send asylum seekers to Rwanda for processing and potential resettlement. Critics argue that this policy not only breaches international law but also subjects asylum seekers to inhumane treatment and uncertainty. The charities emphasize that the policy has been widely condemned by human rights organizations and legal experts, who argue that it undermines the UK's commitment to protecting refugees and asylum seekers.

In addition to the Rwanda plan, the article highlights other policies that have drawn criticism, such as the use of hotels and barges to house asylum seekers. These accommodations have been described as inadequate and unsuitable, leading to reports of poor living conditions and mental health issues among asylum seekers. The charities argue that such policies not only fail to address the needs of asylum seekers but also contribute to a broader narrative of hostility and dehumanization.

The article also discusses the broader context of the UK's asylum system, noting that the number of asylum seekers arriving in the UK has increased in recent years, putting pressure on the existing infrastructure. However, the charities argue that the government's response has been inadequate and punitive rather than compassionate and solution-oriented. They call for a more humane approach that includes providing safe and legal routes for asylum seekers, ensuring timely processing of asylum claims, and offering adequate support and integration services for those granted asylum.

The coalition's letter to the UK government outlines several key recommendations for reforming the asylum system. These include ending the use of the Rwanda deportation plan and other punitive measures, investing in a well-resourced and efficient asylum processing system, and working with local communities and civil society to support the integration of refugees. The charities also call for the government to uphold its international obligations under the 1951 Refugee Convention and other human rights treaties.

The article further explores the public and political response to the coalition's call for action. It notes that while some political figures and segments of the public have expressed support for the charities' demands, others have defended the government's policies as necessary to deter illegal immigration and manage the asylum system effectively. The article cites statements from government officials who argue that the Rwanda plan and other measures are essential for maintaining control over the UK's borders and ensuring that the asylum system is not overwhelmed.

However, the charities and their supporters counter that such arguments are misguided and fail to address the root causes of migration and the humanitarian needs of asylum seekers. They argue that a more compassionate and rights-based approach would not only be more humane but also more effective in the long term. The article includes quotes from representatives of the charities, who emphasize the moral and legal imperative to protect the rights of asylum seekers and refugees.

The article also touches on the broader global context of asylum and migration, noting that the UK is not alone in facing challenges related to asylum policy. Many countries around the world are grappling with similar issues, and the article suggests that the UK could learn from the experiences of other nations that have implemented more humane and effective asylum systems.

In conclusion, the article underscores the urgency and importance of the charities' call for action. It highlights the need for the UK government to reconsider its asylum policies and adopt a more compassionate and rights-based approach. The article emphasizes that the current policies not only fail to meet the needs of asylum seekers but also undermine the UK's reputation as a country committed to human rights and humanitarian values. The charities' call for action is framed as a critical opportunity for the UK to demonstrate leadership and compassion in addressing one of the most pressing humanitarian challenges of our time.

Overall, the article provides a comprehensive overview of the issues surrounding the UK's asylum policies, the criticisms leveled by over 170 charities, and the broader context of global migration and asylum. It serves as a call to action for policymakers, civil society, and the public to engage in a meaningful dialogue about how best to support and protect asylum seekers and refugees.

Read the Full Reuters Article at:
[ https://www.yahoo.com/news/over-170-charities-call-end-114239907.html ]

Publication Contributing Sources