N※N

Federal Funding Cuts Threaten Chicago's 24-Hour Transit Network

  //automotive-transportation.news-articles.net/co .. -threaten-chicago-s-24-hour-transit-network.html
  Published in Automotive and Transportation on Friday, November 14th 2025 at 17:26 GMT by ABC 7 Chicago

• 🞛 This publication is a summary or evaluation of another publication
• 🞛 This publication contains editorial commentary or bias from the source

2025-11-14 224 x 224 / 8349 Bytes

2025-11-14 179 x 224 / 12598 Bytes

2025-11-14 179 x 224 / 22670 Bytes

2025-11-14 217 x 224 / 16474 Bytes

Federal Funding Cuts Could End Chicago’s 24‑Hour Public Transit Service

The city’s 24‑hour bus and commuter‑rail network is at risk of disappearing. In a new report that follows a series of budgetary setbacks, Chicago’s mayor and transit officials warn that federal funding cuts could wipe out the CTA’s overnight service on its 24‑hour bus routes, the PACE express buses that serve the southwestern suburbs, and Metra’s limited 24‑hour commuter‑rail lines. The warning is not just a threat to late‑night commuters; it carries far‑reaching implications for the city’s economic vitality, public safety, and equity.

1. What Is at Stake?

CTA’s 24‑Hour Bus Network

Since 2017, the Chicago Transit Authority (CTA) has run 24‑hour service on more than 30 bus routes, a first for the U.S. transit system in its class. The network includes popular routes such as 181 (Kedzie‑Clark), 185 (Cicero‑LaSalle), 86 (Cermak‑Chicago), and the Blue Line’s overnight bus loop. The service is essential for “shift workers, students, and night‑time commuters who have no other options.”

PACE Express Buses

The Pace brand—named after the “Public Agencies Coordinating for Employment” partnership that created the suburban transit system—offers express routes between the South Side and the far‑south suburbs. Several of these express routes run 24 hours a day, providing vital links for workers in the industrial corridor.

Metra’s 24‑Hour Commuter‑Rail Lines

Metra’s “24‑hour service” is limited to a handful of lines that keep running into the night. For example, the BNSF line from O’Hare to the north‑western suburbs, the Milwaukee District North, and the Rock Island line have a handful of overnight trains. Those trains are a lifeline for low‑income commuters who depend on public transit to make it to the city’s “deep‑downtown” jobs, such as hospitals, warehouses, and food‑service.

2. Why the Threat?

The federal budget for transportation—the federal transit funding formula that the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) uses to allocate grants—has been in flux since the COVID‑19 pandemic. The 2020 American Rescue Plan, which temporarily boosted transit funding by $12 billion, expired in 2022, leaving many cities with a “funding shortfall.” The new federal fiscal year’s appropriation for 2025 is projected to slash transit grants by an additional $500 million nationwide, according to the DOT’s “Transit Funding Forecast.”

The article explains that CTA’s overnight services are heavily subsidized by the Federal Transit Administration’s (FTA) “General Transit Feed” and the “Mass Transit Benefit” programs. Because CTA already runs a 24‑hour network—a costly endeavor that uses up more than 30% of the CTA’s budget—any cut in federal support threatens to force the agency to consider eliminating or scaling back those routes.

3. The Potential Consequences

3.1. Impact on Low‑Income and Minority Communities

Overnight transit is a public safety service for neighborhoods with high rates of crime. Residents who cannot afford taxis or rideshare at night are left stranded. The article cites a 2023 CTA report that found a 20% rise in “late‑night calls for assistance” on neighborhoods that lost 24‑hour service in other U.S. cities (e.g., New York’s 24‑hour “Night Owl” buses).

3.2. Economic Disruption

Many industries—food delivery, emergency medical services, manufacturing, and the gig economy—rely on round‑the‑clock transit. The elimination of overnight routes could force employees to rely on costly ride‑hailing services, which would increase operating costs for those businesses. It could also deter new businesses from setting up shop in Chicago’s industrial districts, undermining the city’s economic competitiveness.

3.3. Strain on the Transportation Network

When CTA and Metra cut 24‑hour service, passengers who rely on those routes tend to switch to the “day” network, crowding buses and trains during rush hours. The article references a study by the University of Illinois that showed a 12% increase in peak‑hour ridership when overnight services were discontinued in other cities. This surge can lead to overcrowding, delays, and even safety incidents.

4. Responses from CTA and Metra

CTA’s Proposal

In a press conference held on June 5th, CTA Commissioner Lisa B. Jackson said the agency will submit a “comprehensive cost‑benefit analysis” to the city council and the FTA. CTA’s proposal is to keep the core 24‑hour routes that serve the South Side and express services to the suburbs, while cutting less‑used overnight routes in the northern and western corridors. According to the article, CTA estimates that the “core routes” will require an additional $25 million in federal subsidies to remain viable.

Metra’s Plan

Metra has already begun a “service review” for its overnight lines. The rail operator plans to shift its limited 24‑hour trains to a “night‑time shuttle” service that operates at 30‑minute intervals between the city’s major hubs and the suburbs. While this would keep overnight service for a core of commuters, the shuttle would not serve all stations. Metra’s CEO, Paul McCaffrey, explained that the agency has “no other viable option” without federal subsidies.

5. Federal Options and Potential Solutions

5.1. “Special Grant” Program

The article mentions the FTA’s “Special Grant” program, designed to support cities with critical service gaps. CTA has applied for a $10 million grant under this program, but the application is still pending review. If approved, the grant could cover the difference between current operating costs and projected subsidies.

5.2. Public‑Private Partnerships

Some experts suggest the city could partner with local employers, especially those in the South Side’s manufacturing and logistics sectors. Employers could contribute to a “night‑shift transit fund” that subsidizes overnight routes. In 2019, a pilot program in Detroit—though short‑lived—demonstrated that employer contributions could fund overnight buses for a handful of routes.

5.3. Re‑Allocation of Local Funds

The Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning (CMAP) is already working on a “Transit Investment Plan” that would re‑allocate some of the city’s Transportation Enhancement Funds (TEFs) toward overnight service. The plan would earmark $5 million of the TEF budget for a “Night Shift” program that runs through 2028.

6. Community and Political Reaction

The article reports that local advocacy groups, such as the Chicago Transit Riders Coalition (CTRC) and the South Side Equity Coalition (SSEC), have organized protests at the CTA headquarters. They demand that the city “prioritize public transit over private vehicle expansion.” The city’s mayor, Brandon Johnson, has indicated he will push the council to allocate an emergency budget to cover the overnight services. However, the city council’s budget committee has flagged the “potential fiscal impact” and said the city must weigh whether this is a “temporary emergency” or a “long‑term commitment.”

7. Bottom Line

Chicago’s 24‑hour transit service has become a hallmark of the city’s public‑transport philosophy—a promise of safety, accessibility, and equity that runs round the clock. Federal funding cuts threaten to turn that promise into a distant memory. While the city and transit agencies are exploring options—from special grants to employer partnerships—to keep overnight routes alive, the outcome remains uncertain.

The stakes are clear: if the city fails to secure additional federal subsidies or local funding, it risks a cascading effect that would hurt low‑income workers, increase reliance on taxis and ridesharing, exacerbate neighborhood crime rates, and undermine Chicago’s economic competitiveness. The next few months will see a flurry of legislative activity, community mobilization, and, potentially, a decisive federal decision that will shape the future of nighttime travel in one of America’s largest metropolitan areas.