N※N

Transport Minister Denies Contract Drivers' Fault in Tenkasi Bus Crash

80

  //automotive-transportation.news-articles.net/co .. contract-drivers-fault-in-tenkasi-bus-crash.html
  Published in Automotive and Transportation on Monday, December 1st 2025 at 23:27 GMT by The New Indian Express

• 🞛 This publication is a summary or evaluation of another publication
• 🞛 This publication contains editorial commentary or bias from the source

2025-12-01 224 x 224 / 9038 Bytes

2025-12-01 179 x 224 / 11196 Bytes

2025-12-01 224 x 224 / 13510 Bytes

2025-12-01 190 x 224 / 11865 Bytes

Transport Minister Refutes Allegations That Contract Drivers Were to Blame for Tenkasi Bus Crash

December 2, 2025 – Tamil Nadu

A catastrophic bus crash that occurred in the Tenkasi district earlier this month has left the state government under intense scrutiny. The incident, which killed 28 people and injured 45, sparked an immediate wave of accusations that contract drivers—those hired by private transport operators rather than employed directly by the state—had been negligent. In a sharp rebuttal, Tamil Nadu’s Minister of Transport, P. R. Venkatesan, issued a statement early Thursday morning dismissing the claim and outlining the steps being taken to investigate the crash.

1. The Crash: A Brief Overview

On December 1, 2025, a Kamaraj Express bus traveling from Tenkasi to Tirunelveli suffered a sudden loss of control near the R. S. P. C. Bridge over the Vellore River. Witnesses reported that the vehicle veered off the roadway, colliding with a roadside billboard and a parked truck. The impact caused the bus to overturn and a large section of its rear to buckle, trapping passengers inside. Emergency services were on the scene within ten minutes; despite rapid rescue efforts, 28 passengers were pronounced dead at the hospital, and 45 others sustained injuries ranging from minor bruises to life‑threatening internal damage.

The Transport Ministry has identified the bus as a state‑owned, contract‑operated vehicle—that is, it was owned by the Tamil Nadu transport authority but operated by a private company under a lease agreement. As such, the driver and crew were contract employees rather than state staff.

2. Allegations Against Contract Drivers

Within hours of the crash, several media outlets, local politicians, and victim families began pointing the finger at the contract drivers. They cited an alleged lack of proper training and oversight as the root cause. A prominent local newspaper—The Tamil Nadu Herald—published a front‑page headline asserting, “Contract drivers in question after fatal bus crash.” In addition, a Facebook group run by survivors’ families demanded that the ministry hold the contract drivers accountable, citing earlier incidents in which private operators were found to be in violation of road‑safety norms.

The Tamil Nadu Transport Union, CCTTU (Central Contract Transport Trade Union), also released a statement condemning the “unfounded accusations” and insisting that the “true culprits lie in systemic failures rather than individual negligence.”

3. Minister Venkatesan’s Rebuttal

In a televised address at the Tenkasi Police Headquarters, Minister Venkatesan made it clear that the transport ministry does not accept the claim that the contract drivers were responsible for the crash. “There is no evidence that the drivers performed any negligent act,” he said. “The Ministry has already sent a multi‑disciplinary investigation team comprising engineers, safety analysts, and the Motor Vehicles Department to examine the bus’s mechanical condition, the driver’s logs, and the road environment.”

He added that preliminary findings from the Vehicle Inspection Bureau indicated that the bus’s braking system had recently undergone maintenance and that the tire pressure was within regulatory limits. “We are also looking into whether an unexpected mechanical failure or a sudden loss of power may have caused the crash,” the minister said.

Venkatesan stressed that the state had re‑evaluated its contract driver vetting process and would tighten training requirements, including regular safety drills and real‑time GPS monitoring. “The safety of our citizens is our top priority. If any fault is found, it will be addressed promptly.”

4. Investigation Details

The investigation team has already gathered several key pieces of evidence:

• Digital footage from the bus’s in‑vehicle camera system shows the last 20 seconds of the journey. The footage indicates that the bus was traveling at approximately 60 km/h on a two‑lane road, with no signs of abrupt steering before impact.

• Road condition reports from the Tenkasi Roads and Bridges Department confirm that the bridge’s surface had minor potholes but was structurally sound. No recent major repairs were undertaken.

• Mechanical inspection reports reveal that the bus’s engine control unit (ECU) had a fault code logged 12 hours before the crash, indicating a possible hydraulic failure that could have incapacitated the braking system.

• Driver logbooks show the contract driver had conducted 48 hours of continuous operation in the days leading up to the crash, which falls within the legal limit set by the Motor Vehicles Act.

• Witness statements suggest that there was no traffic violation—no illegal passing or abrupt lane changes were reported.

The Ministry has also requested traffic camera footage from adjacent intersections to ascertain whether external factors—such as a sudden pedestrian crossing or a vehicle collision—may have contributed.

5. Stakeholder Reactions

• Victim families: While some families remain skeptical, others have expressed gratitude for the Ministry’s commitment to a thorough investigation. “We want to know the truth,” said R. K. Mehta, a mother of a deceased passenger. “If the drivers were at fault, they must be held accountable.”

• Transport union: CCTTU’s president, S. N. Rao, acknowledged the Ministry’s call for stricter training but warned against “blaming contract drivers without solid proof.” He urged the government to “reassess the financial model of contract operations.”

• Opposition parties: Several legislators from the opposition DMK (Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam) demanded a public inquiry and a cancellation of all contract driver agreements until the investigation concludes. They alleged that the state’s reliance on contract operators has become a “public safety hazard.”

• Road safety experts: Dr. V. R. Kumar, a professor at the Indian Institute of Road Safety in Chennai, suggested that the incident might be a case of “design flaw” in the bus’s braking system, advocating for a review of all state‑owned buses.

6. Government Measures and Future Plans

In response to the crash, the Tamil Nadu government has announced several policy measures:

1. Mandatory periodic safety audits for all contract‑operated buses, with a minimum of three audits per year.

2. Introduction of an electronic driver monitoring system (EDMS) that logs speed, braking patterns, and driver fatigue metrics.

3. Revised contract terms that require private operators to carry higher liability insurance and to provide comprehensive training certificates for all drivers.

4. Road infrastructure assessment: A dedicated task force will conduct a safety audit of all major bus routes, focusing on bridge conditions, road surfacing, and signage.

5. Public awareness campaigns about road safety and emergency response procedures, to be rolled out through local media and community outreach.

The Minister added that these steps will be implemented within six months and that any contract drivers found to be in violation of safety protocols will face penalties ranging from fines to revocation of contracts.

7. Conclusion

The Tenkasi bus crash has put Tamil Nadu’s contract driver system under a harsh microscope. While early allegations suggested negligence on the part of the drivers, the Transport Minister’s comprehensive response indicates that the ministry is pursuing an exhaustive investigation before assigning blame. The incident has spurred a broader discussion about the role of contract operators in public transport safety and has prompted the government to consider stricter oversight and infrastructural improvements. As the investigation progresses, the public and policymakers alike will be watching closely to see whether this tragedy leads to meaningful reforms in the state's transport ecosystem.