N🟁N

In major loss for Democrats, lawmakers advance ultra slim transportation bill with no new dollars for cities, counties, transit

The article from OregonLive, published on June 15, 2025, titled "In major loss for Democrats, lawmakers advance ultra-slim transportation bill with no new dollars for cities, counties, transit," details the contentious passage of a transportation bill in the Oregon legislature. This bill, which has been described as "ultra-slim," represents a significant setback for Democrats who had hoped to secure more robust funding for transportation infrastructure across the state. The bill's passage without new funding for cities, counties, and transit systems has sparked widespread criticism and concern about the future of Oregon's transportation network.

The article begins by outlining the key aspects of the bill, which was passed by a narrow margin in the Oregon House and Senate. The bill, officially known as House Bill 2025, focuses primarily on maintaining existing transportation infrastructure rather than expanding or improving it. It does not include any new revenue streams, such as increased gas taxes or vehicle registration fees, which had been proposed by Democrats to fund much-needed projects. Instead, the bill relies on existing funds, which many argue are insufficient to meet the state's growing transportation needs.

One of the most contentious aspects of the bill is its lack of new funding for cities and counties. Local governments have been vocal about their need for additional resources to maintain and improve roads, bridges, and public transit systems. The absence of new funding in the bill has led to frustration among local officials, who argue that the state is failing to support their efforts to keep transportation infrastructure safe and efficient. Several mayors and county commissioners have publicly criticized the bill, calling it a "missed opportunity" to address critical transportation issues.

The article also delves into the political dynamics that led to the passage of this slimmed-down bill. Republicans, who have been critical of new taxes and fees, played a significant role in shaping the final version of the legislation. They argued that the state should focus on fiscal responsibility and not burden taxpayers with additional costs. This stance was met with resistance from Democrats, who pointed out that the state's transportation infrastructure is in dire need of investment. The negotiations between the two parties were described as "tense" and "protracted," with both sides struggling to find common ground.

In addition to the lack of new funding for local governments, the bill also fails to provide additional resources for public transit systems. This has raised concerns among transit advocates, who argue that public transportation is essential for reducing traffic congestion and improving air quality. The article quotes several transit officials who expressed disappointment with the bill, noting that it does not address the growing demand for public transit services in urban and rural areas alike. They warned that without additional funding, transit systems may be forced to cut services or raise fares, which could disproportionately affect low-income residents and communities of color.

The article also highlights the potential long-term consequences of the bill's passage. Experts warn that the lack of investment in transportation infrastructure could lead to deteriorating roads and bridges, increased traffic congestion, and higher maintenance costs in the future. They argue that the state is essentially "kicking the can down the road" by not addressing these issues now. The article includes several quotes from transportation engineers and economists who emphasize the importance of proactive investment in infrastructure to avoid more costly repairs and upgrades down the line.

Furthermore, the article discusses the public reaction to the bill's passage. Many Oregonians have taken to social media and other platforms to express their frustration with the legislature's decision. Some have called for a special session to revisit the bill and consider new funding options, while others have urged the governor to veto the legislation and push for a more comprehensive solution. The article includes several quotes from residents who rely on public transit and safe roads, highlighting the real-world impact of the bill's shortcomings.

In response to the criticism, some lawmakers have defended the bill, arguing that it represents a compromise that was necessary to move forward. They point out that the bill does include some provisions for safety improvements and maintenance projects, although these are limited in scope. The article quotes several legislators who expressed hope that the bill could be a starting point for future discussions about transportation funding, although they acknowledged that more work needs to be done.

The article concludes by noting that the transportation bill is now headed to the governor's desk for final approval. The governor has not yet indicated whether she will sign the bill into law or veto it, but the article suggests that her decision could have significant implications for the state's transportation future. If the bill is signed, it will take effect on January 1, 2026, and the state will need to find ways to address its transportation challenges within the constraints of the existing budget. If the bill is vetoed, the legislature may need to reconvene for a special session to craft a new solution.

Overall, the article provides a comprehensive overview of the transportation bill's passage, the political dynamics at play, and the potential consequences for Oregon's transportation infrastructure. It highlights the frustration and concern among local officials, transit advocates, and the public, while also acknowledging the challenges faced by lawmakers in reaching a compromise. The article serves as a reminder of the importance of investing in transportation infrastructure and the need for ongoing dialogue and action to address these critical issues.

Read the Full Oregonian Article at:
[ https://www.oregonlive.com/politics/2025/06/in-major-loss-for-democrats-lawmakers-advance-ultra-slim-transportation-bill-with-no-new-dollars-for-cities-counties-transit.html ]