• Sat, October 24, 2026
  • Fri, October 23, 2026
  • Thu, October 22, 2026
  • Wed, October 21, 2026
  • Tue, October 20, 2026
  • Mon, October 19, 2026
  • Sat, October 17, 2026
  • Fri, October 16, 2026
  • Thu, October 15, 2026
  • Wed, October 14, 2026
  • Tue, October 13, 2026
  • Sun, October 11, 2026
  • Fri, October 9, 2026
  • Thu, October 8, 2026

Lessons from Japan: Avoiding Chinese EV Dominance

China's dominance in Electric Vehicles (EVs) and battery technology mirrors the previous Japanese rise, posing a national security risk for the US.

The Historical Precedent: The Japanese Ascendancy

To understand the current urgency, one must look at the precedent set by the rise of Japanese automakers. For decades, the American automotive sector operated under a veil of complacency, bolstered by a domestic monopoly and a lack of meaningful global competition. This era ended as Japanese manufacturers introduced lean manufacturing processes, higher fuel efficiency, and superior quality control—innovations that the established U.S. giants failed to adopt with sufficient speed.

The result was a gradual but systemic erosion of market share and a decline in the global competitiveness of American-made vehicles. The "loss" to Japan was not merely a loss of sales, but a loss of industrial agility. By the time the U.S. industry attempted to pivot, the structural advantages had shifted toward the East, creating a blueprint for how a dominant power can be displaced through technological superiority and operational efficiency.

The Modern Crisis: The Chinese Surge

Lazio asserts that the current situation with China is an alarm that should be ringing loudly across the U.S. policy landscape. While the race with Japan focused on internal combustion engine (ICE) efficiency and manufacturing quality, the race with China is centered on the transition to Electric Vehicles (EVs), battery technology, and software integration.

  1. Supply Chain Control: China controls a vast majority of the processing and refining of critical minerals—such as lithium, cobalt, and graphite—essential for battery production. This creates a vertical integration that allows Chinese firms to lower costs and ensure stability that Western manufacturers cannot match.
  1. Battery Innovation: Through companies like CATL and BYD, China has moved beyond simple assembly to lead in the chemistry and scaling of battery cells, which are the most expensive and complex components of the modern vehicle.
  1. Software-Defined Vehicles (SDVs): The automotive industry is shifting from hardware-centric design to software-centric design. China is rapidly integrating AI, autonomous driving features, and connected ecosystem services into their vehicles, turning the car into a mobile smart device.

Strategic Vulnerabilities and Implications

China has strategically positioned itself at the center of the EV ecosystem. This dominance is not accidental but the result of concerted state industrial policy. The Chinese advantage is three-fold

The concern highlighted by Lazio is that the U.S. is once again lagging in the adoption of these critical shifts. If the U.S. fails to secure its own battery supply chains and innovate in the realm of automotive software, it risks a level of dependence on China that exceeds the previous dependence on Japanese imports.

This is not merely an economic issue but a matter of national security. The automotive sector is one of the largest employers in the United States and a cornerstone of the industrial base. A total loss of competitiveness in the EV sector would lead to the hollowing out of the domestic manufacturing heartland, leaving the U.S. vulnerable to external price shocks and technological bottlenecks.

The Path Forward

Extrapolating from these facts, the necessary response requires more than just subsidies; it demands a systemic overhaul of how the U.S. approaches industrial policy. To avoid a repeat of the Japanese era, the focus must shift toward securing raw materials through new alliances, investing heavily in domestic battery gigafactories, and fostering a software ecosystem that can compete with the integrated platforms emerging from China.

The alarm raised by Lazio serves as a reminder that industrial dominance is not a permanent state. Without a proactive and strategic pivot, the United States may find itself a passenger in a global automotive market designed and controlled by others.


Read the Full Fortune Article at:
https://fortune.com/2026/10/24/rick-lazio-we-lost-auto-race-to-japan-china-should-alarm-us/
Like: 👍