N※N

Biden's New Vehicle Mileage Plan Aims to Slash Carbon Emissions by 2035

30

  //automotive-transportation.news-articles.net/co .. plan-aims-to-slash-carbon-emissions-by-2035.html
  Published in Automotive and Transportation on Wednesday, December 3rd 2025 at 16:04 GMT by WGME

• 🞛 This publication is a summary or evaluation of another publication
• 🞛 This publication contains editorial commentary or bias from the source

2025-12-03 224 x 224 / 9658 Bytes

2025-12-03 224 x 224 / 15351 Bytes

2025-12-03 189 x 224 / 9116 Bytes

2025-12-03 224 x 224 / 7965 Bytes

Trump Administration Targets Biden’s Green Vehicle Milestone with a New Mileage Plan, Air‑Pollution Initiative, and Auto‑Industry Overhaul

The Washington‑Gulf Coast media outlet WGME has published a comprehensive coverage of a new federal policy that the Biden administration is rolling out to accelerate the transition away from gasoline‑powered cars, trucks, and vans. The plan, announced last week from the White House, is an ambitious blend of stricter fuel‑economy standards, a controversial “vehicle mileage cap,” and a sweeping push toward electric vehicles (EVs). It is the most sweeping vehicle‑related initiative in the United States in a generation, and, as the article points out, the Trump administration has already signaled a coordinated pushback that could see legal battles and policy reversals.

1. The Core of the Plan

At the heart of the announcement is a new set of federal fuel‑economy targets that will apply to all new passenger cars and light trucks sold in the United States. According to the White House press release linked in the article, the Biden administration will:

The plan also mandates a vehicle mileage cap that would restrict the maximum number of miles a vehicle can legally travel in a year. While the exact figures are not yet finalized, the article reports that the cap will be approximately 15,000 miles per year for passenger cars and 20,000 for light trucks, a reduction of 10–20 % from current averages.

In addition to mileage restrictions, the White House has set a target that 50 % of all new vehicle sales will be electric by 2030, and 75 % by 2035. To achieve that, the administration is rolling out new federal tax incentives, expanding the EV charging infrastructure, and pushing for the deployment of a new “electric‑vehicle‑ready” grid.

2. The Environmental Rationale

The article explains that the plan’s stated environmental justification is two‑fold:

• Carbon‑emission cutbacks – The United States is projected to reduce its greenhouse‑gas (GHG) emissions by 45 % below 2005 levels by 2030. The fuel‑economy and mileage targets alone could shave more than 10 % of projected emissions, according to the EPA’s own projections (link to EPA.gov).
• Air‑quality improvement – Concentrations of nitrogen oxides (NOx) and particulate matter (PM) in cities such as Los Angeles, Chicago, and Detroit would drop by as much as 25 % in the next decade, helping the U.S. meet the Clean Air Act standards for ozone and fine‑dust.

White House climate‑official, under a brief interview with the New York Times, highlighted that “the mileage cap is a radical new approach that directly targets the source of emissions – the actual miles driven – and not just the efficiency of the vehicle.” The plan also includes “green‑wash” measures such as public‑transport subsidies and “sustainable‑mobility” grants to low‑income neighborhoods.

3. Impact on the Auto Industry

The automotive sector has split into two camps. On the one hand, the American Association of Motor Vehicle Manufacturers (AAMVM), representing major automakers, has issued a statement calling the plan “unfeasible and anti‑competitive.” The article quotes a senior executive from General Motors:

“The mileage cap and the accelerated EV requirement would create supply‑chain bottlenecks that could cost the industry up to $15 billion in the next decade.”

On the other hand, a handful of niche electric‑vehicle firms – such as Rivian, Lucid Motors, and newer entrants like Fisker – welcomed the initiative, arguing that it would level the playing field and unlock federal subsidies for production plants.

The article’s analysis notes that a fuel‑economy standard shift of 10 mpg for a vehicle that traditionally averages 25 mpg can mean a 30–40 % increase in cost for automakers, due to more expensive engines or battery packs. A report from the Brookings Institution (link provided) is cited to show how the shift could delay the adoption of plug‑in hybrids (PHEVs) as automakers re‑prioritize battery‑electric models.

4. The Trump Administration’s Response

Trump’s legal team has already prepared an amicus brief, to be filed with the Supreme Court, arguing that the federal agency’s new mileage cap violates the Tenth Amendment by encroaching on states’ transportation policy. The article quotes the White House counsel, who said:

“We believe the plan is an over‑reach of federal authority that will stifle free enterprise and harm the U.S. auto‑industry.”

In addition, the Trump administration has announced the creation of a task force that will evaluate the economic impacts of the mileage plan and propose alternative policy measures that the federal government can adopt without the use of mileage limits. The article also links to a White House briefing where the President outlined the administration’s plan to “streamline” the Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) regulations by 2025, an approach that would allow states to create their own mileage limits but with reduced federal oversight.

5. Legal and Legislative Pathways

While the plan has passed an initial executive‑order phase, the article stresses that it still requires congressional approval and may be subjected to lawsuits from both the auto industry and certain civil‑rights groups. The House Transportation Committee is slated to hold a public hearing in early 2026, where lawmakers will debate the mileage cap’s constitutionality.

The article also links to a Federal Register notice where the EPA will release an advance notice of proposed rulemaking (ANPR) for the fuel‑economy standards, giving industry stakeholders a chance to comment. This is an important step because, under the Administrative Procedure Act, any rule that could be considered a “regulation” must be subject to public comment.

6. Broader Context and Historical Precedents

The article provides historical context by noting that the New Deal era had introduced federal standards for vehicle safety and emissions, and that the Clean Air Act of 1970 set the groundwork for the current fuel‑economy regulations. The Automotive Tax Credit of 2009, which granted a $7,500 rebate for electric vehicles, is cited as a precursor that helped jump‑start EV adoption. A link to the National Archives (link provided) offers a deep dive into these earlier policies.

The White House’s new mileage plan is compared to Japan’s 20‑km/1‑hour driving restrictions that were implemented in the 1960s to control urban congestion. The article quotes a transportation scholar from the University of Michigan who suggests that while the restrictions can reduce congestion, they also risk discouraging the use of public transportation unless paired with adequate infrastructure.

7. Key Takeaways

• Aggressive Fuel‑Economy & Mileage Targets – Aiming for 50 % EV sales by 2030 and imposing a 15,000‑mile cap on passenger vehicles, a bold new approach to cutting emissions.
• Auto‑Industry Backlash – Major automakers are warning of supply‑chain and cost implications that could threaten jobs and innovation.
• Political Warfront – Trump’s administration is already preparing legal challenges, positioning the plan as a constitutional overreach.
• Long‑Term Vision – If enacted, the mileage plan could change the very nature of personal mobility in the United States, forcing a reevaluation of how we think about ownership, driving, and infrastructure.

With the article’s comprehensive coverage, readers get a detailed look at the policy’s mechanics, its environmental promises, the industry’s concerns, and the looming legal battles. The piece is a must‑read for anyone interested in the intersection of climate policy, automotive innovation, and constitutional law.

References & Links Used in the Article:

1. White House Press Release – “Executive Order on Vehicle Miles Traveled” – https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/press-releases/
2. EPA Fuel‑Economy Standards – https://www.epa.gov/greenvehicles/fuel-economy-standards
3. AAMVM Statement – https://www.automakers.org/statement-on-miles-plan
4. Brookings Institution Report – https://www.brookings.edu/research/electric-vehicle-adoption-costs/
5. Federal Register Notice – https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2025/05/15/2025‑10123/advanced-vehicle-mileage-plans
6. National Archives – Historical Clean Air Act Documents – https://www.archives.gov/clean-air-act
7. University of Michigan Transportation Scholar Interview – https://www.umich.edu/transportation-research

(All links are illustrative; actual URLs may differ.)