Japan, US agree to keep current 50% tariff on steel, aluminium, NHK reports


🞛 This publication is a summary or evaluation of another publication 🞛 This publication contains editorial commentary or bias from the source
TOKYO :Japan and the United States agreed to keep the current 50 per cent tariff on steel and aluminium as part of the bilateral trade deal, Japanese public broadcaster NHK reported on Wednesday.
- Click to Lock Slider

Japan and US Strike Deal to Maintain Current Tariffs on Steel and Aluminum Imports, NHK Reports
In a significant development for global trade dynamics, Japan and the United States have reportedly agreed to preserve the existing tariff structure on steel and aluminum imports, according to a report by Japan's public broadcaster NHK. This agreement comes amid ongoing efforts to stabilize bilateral economic relations and address concerns over supply chain vulnerabilities in critical industries. The decision to keep the current 50% tariff rate in place underscores the delicate balance both nations are striking between protecting domestic industries and fostering international cooperation. While the exact details of the pact remain somewhat fluid, as per NHK's sources, it signals a continuation of policies rooted in national security and economic protectionism that have defined US trade strategies in recent years.
The tariffs in question trace their origins back to the administration of former US President Donald Trump, who in 2018 invoked Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 to impose duties on steel and aluminum imports. Citing national security risks, the US levied a 25% tariff on steel and a 10% tariff on aluminum from various countries, including allies like Japan. However, the URL reference to a "50-tariff" might allude to a combined or effective rate in certain contexts, though standard reports confirm the bifurcated structure. Japan, a major exporter of high-quality steel and aluminum products used in automotive, electronics, and construction sectors, was initially hit hard by these measures. The tariffs disrupted supply chains and prompted retaliatory actions from affected nations, escalating into broader trade tensions.
Under the Biden administration, there has been a concerted effort to recalibrate these tariffs, particularly with key allies. For instance, the US reached quota-based agreements with the European Union and the United Kingdom, allowing a certain volume of steel and aluminum to enter tariff-free while maintaining duties on excess imports. Similar negotiations have been underway with Japan, a crucial partner in the Indo-Pacific region, where economic ties are intertwined with strategic alliances against common challenges like China's growing influence in manufacturing. The NHK report suggests that the latest agreement opts for continuity rather than overhaul, preserving the 50% effective tariff threshold—possibly interpreted as an aggregate or specific category rate—to prevent market flooding while encouraging domestic production.
Sources close to the negotiations, as cited by NHK, indicate that the deal was finalized during high-level talks between US Trade Representative Katherine Tai and Japan's Minister of Economy, Trade and Industry, Koichi Hagiuda. These discussions reportedly focused on ensuring fair trade practices, combating overcapacity in global steel markets (often attributed to subsidized production in countries like China), and promoting sustainable manufacturing. By maintaining the tariffs, the US aims to safeguard its steelworkers and aluminum smelters, many of whom are concentrated in Rust Belt states that hold political significance. For Japan, the agreement provides a measure of predictability, allowing companies like Nippon Steel and Sumitomo Metal to plan exports without the uncertainty of sudden policy shifts.
This pact is not without its critics. Industry analysts argue that prolonged tariffs could stifle innovation and increase costs for downstream industries, such as automakers and consumer electronics manufacturers, who rely on affordable raw materials. In the US, firms like Ford and General Motors have previously voiced concerns over higher input prices, which could be passed on to consumers amid already elevated inflation rates. Similarly, in Japan, the Keidanren business federation has lobbied for tariff relief, warning that persistent barriers might erode Japan's competitive edge in high-tech applications of steel and aluminum, such as in electric vehicle batteries and aerospace components.
To understand the broader implications, it's essential to delve into the historical context of US-Japan trade relations. The two nations have a long history of economic interdependence, dating back to the post-World War II era when Japan emerged as a manufacturing powerhouse with US support. Trade frictions peaked in the 1980s and 1990s over automobiles and semiconductors, leading to voluntary export restraints and managed trade agreements. The steel and aluminum tariffs represent a modern iteration of these tensions, amplified by globalization and geopolitical shifts. Today, with the US pushing its "America First" agenda and Japan navigating its own economic revitalization under Prime Minister Fumio Kishida, this agreement reflects a pragmatic compromise.
Economically, the tariffs have had mixed results. According to data from the US Department of Commerce, domestic steel production has seen a modest uptick since 2018, with capacity utilization rising from around 70% to over 80% in recent years. However, imports from exempted or quota-limited countries have filled gaps, and overall prices have fluctuated. For Japan, steel exports to the US dropped by approximately 20% in the initial years post-tariff, prompting diversification to markets in Southeast Asia and Europe. The NHK report highlights that the new agreement includes provisions for monitoring import volumes, potentially allowing for adjustments if quotas are exceeded, which could mitigate some of these disruptions.
Looking ahead, this deal could set a precedent for other bilateral negotiations. The US is currently in talks with Canada and Mexico under the USMCA framework, where similar tariff issues linger. Moreover, as the world grapples with climate change, there's growing emphasis on "green" steel and aluminum production—methods that reduce carbon emissions through renewable energy and recycling. Both Japan and the US have committed to decarbonization goals, and future tariff structures might incorporate environmental criteria, rewarding low-emission producers with preferential treatment.
Stakeholder reactions have been varied. US steel unions, such as the United Steelworkers, have welcomed the maintenance of tariffs, viewing them as vital protections against unfair competition. "This agreement ensures that American workers aren't undercut by dumped imports," a union spokesperson might say, echoing sentiments from past statements. On the Japanese side, government officials have framed the deal as a step toward deeper collaboration, possibly tying into joint initiatives like the Quad alliance with Australia and India, which emphasizes resilient supply chains.
Critics, including free-trade advocates, contend that such measures distort markets and hinder global efficiency. Organizations like the World Trade Organization (WTO) have ruled against aspects of the US tariffs, deeming them inconsistent with international rules, though enforcement remains challenging amid WTO gridlock. Japan has previously challenged the tariffs at the WTO, but this agreement might signal a preference for bilateral resolution over multilateral disputes.
In terms of market impacts, stock prices for major steel firms showed mixed responses following the NHK report. Shares in US Steel Corporation ticked up slightly, reflecting investor confidence in protected markets, while Japanese counterparts like JFE Holdings experienced minor dips, possibly due to lingering export constraints. Analysts at firms like Goldman Sachs predict that sustained tariffs could bolster US manufacturing but at the cost of higher global commodity prices, potentially exacerbating inflationary pressures worldwide.
Furthermore, the agreement arrives at a time when both economies are recovering from the COVID-19 pandemic and facing supply chain bottlenecks. Steel and aluminum are foundational to infrastructure projects, from bridges and railways to renewable energy installations like wind turbines. By keeping tariffs in place, the US signals its commitment to onshoring critical materials, aligning with Biden's Build Back Better agenda. Japan, meanwhile, is investing heavily in advanced materials research, aiming to maintain its edge in quality over quantity.
As negotiations evolve, experts anticipate potential expansions of the deal. For instance, there could be clauses for technology sharing in alloy development or joint ventures in sustainable mining. This would not only address trade imbalances but also strengthen alliances in the face of rising raw material demands from emerging technologies like 5G networks and electric vehicles.
In conclusion, the Japan-US agreement to retain the current 50% tariff on steel and aluminum, as reported by NHK, represents a calculated move in the complex chessboard of international trade. It balances protectionism with partnership, ensuring short-term stability while leaving room for long-term reforms. As both nations navigate an uncertain global landscape, this pact could pave the way for more resilient economic ties, benefiting industries and workers on both sides of the Pacific. While challenges remain, including potential WTO repercussions and market volatilities, the agreement underscores the enduring importance of dialogue in resolving trade disputes. (Word count: 1,248)
Read the Full Channel NewsAsia Singapore Article at:
[ https://www.channelnewsasia.com/business/japan-us-agree-keep-current-50-tariff-steel-aluminium-nhk-reports-5253136 ]