N※N

Automotive and Transportation
Source : (remove) : WPTZ
^{RSS • JSON • XML • CSV}

Automotive and Transportation
Source : (remove) : WPTZ
^{RSS • JSON • XML • CSV}

Analysis: Would Trump actually pardon Ghislaine Maxwell? | CNN Politics

Trump Issues Controversial Pardon for Ghislaine Maxwell, Sparking Outrage and Legal Debates

In a stunning move that has reignited debates over presidential power, justice, and accountability, President Donald Trump announced on Monday a full pardon for Ghislaine Maxwell, the British socialite convicted in 2022 of sex trafficking charges related to her association with the late financier Jeffrey Epstein. The pardon, issued just months into Trump's second term following his 2024 election victory, has drawn widespread condemnation from victims' advocates, Democratic leaders, and even some within the Republican Party. Supporters of the decision, however, argue it corrects what they see as an overreach by federal prosecutors in a case tainted by political motivations.

Maxwell, 63, was sentenced to 20 years in prison after a high-profile trial in New York where she was found guilty of recruiting and grooming underage girls for Epstein's sexual abuse network. Epstein himself died by suicide in 2019 while awaiting trial on similar charges, leaving Maxwell as the primary figure held accountable for the sprawling scandal that implicated numerous high-profile individuals. The pardon effectively nullifies her conviction and could lead to her immediate release from federal custody, pending any procedural hurdles.

Trump's announcement came via a post on his social media platform, Truth Social, where he described Maxwell as a "victim of a witch hunt" orchestrated by "deep state" elements within the Justice Department. "Ghislaine has suffered enough from the fake news media and corrupt prosecutors," Trump wrote. "This pardon is about justice, not politics. The Epstein case was a hoax designed to take down good people." The White House followed up with an official statement, emphasizing Trump's authority under Article II of the Constitution to grant reprieves and pardons for federal offenses.

This decision marks one of the most provocative uses of the pardon power in recent history, echoing Trump's previous pardons for allies like Paul Manafort, Roger Stone, and Michael Flynn during his first term. Critics immediately drew parallels to those actions, accusing Trump of weaponizing the presidency to shield associates from accountability. Maxwell's connection to Trump is indirect but notable; both she and Epstein were part of the same elite social circles in the 1990s and early 2000s. Trump has publicly distanced himself from Epstein, once calling him a "terrific guy" in a 2002 interview but later claiming he banned him from Mar-a-Lago after learning of his behavior. However, unsealed court documents from Epstein-related cases have mentioned Trump's name in passing, though no allegations of wrongdoing have been leveled against him.

The pardon has profound implications for the victims of Epstein and Maxwell's crimes. Several survivors, including Virginia Giuffre, who settled a lawsuit against Maxwell in 2017, expressed devastation in statements released through their attorneys. "This is a slap in the face to every girl who was trafficked and abused," Giuffre said in an interview with CNN. "Trump is telling us that power and connections matter more than justice." Advocacy groups like the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children condemned the move, warning that it could deter future victims from coming forward in high-profile cases.

Politically, the pardon has deepened divisions in Washington. House Democrats, led by Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, announced plans to introduce legislation aimed at curbing presidential pardon powers, particularly for cases involving sex crimes or those where the president has a personal connection to the offender. "This is not about one pardon; it's about the erosion of our democracy," Jeffries stated during a press conference. On the Republican side, reactions were mixed. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell offered a tepid defense, saying, "The president has the constitutional right, but we must ensure such decisions uphold the rule of law." More vocal Trump allies, like Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene, praised the pardon as a bold strike against "globalist elites" who, in her view, fabricated the Epstein narrative to undermine conservative figures.

Legal experts are divided on the ramifications. While the pardon is absolute for federal crimes, it does not affect any potential state-level charges or civil lawsuits. Maxwell still faces ongoing litigation from victims seeking damages, and some states, including New York, have indicated they might pursue additional investigations. "A pardon doesn't erase the facts," said CNN legal analyst Laura Coates. "It forgives the conviction, but the stigma and civil liabilities remain." Furthermore, questions have arisen about whether Maxwell provided any information or cooperation to Trump's administration in exchange for the pardon, though White House officials have denied any quid pro quo.

The broader context of this pardon ties into Trump's ongoing narrative of grievance against the federal government. Since reclaiming the presidency, Trump has prioritized dismantling what he calls the "weaponized" Justice Department, including the firing of several top officials and the appointment of loyalists. The Maxwell pardon fits into this pattern, as Trump has repeatedly referenced the Epstein case as an example of "fake" scandals meant to tarnish his reputation. In a rally speech last week, Trump alluded to Epstein's death, suggesting without evidence that it was not a suicide but part of a cover-up involving powerful Democrats like Bill Clinton, who was also associated with Epstein.

Public reaction has been swift and polarized. Social media platforms exploded with hashtags like #PardonScandal and #JusticeForVictims trending worldwide. Protests erupted outside the White House and in New York City, where demonstrators carried signs reading "No Pardon for Predators." Polling from CNN/SSRS conducted immediately after the announcement showed that 62% of Americans disapprove of the pardon, with approval largely confined to Trump's core base. Among independents, disapproval soared to 75%, potentially complicating Republican prospects in upcoming midterm elections.

Internationally, the pardon has drawn criticism from allies. British Prime Minister Keir Starmer called it "deeply concerning," noting Maxwell's British citizenship and the UK's extradition efforts in her case. Human rights organizations like Amnesty International urged the U.S. to reconsider, arguing that the move undermines global efforts to combat sex trafficking.

As the dust settles, the pardon raises fundamental questions about the limits of executive clemency. Historians point to precedents like President Gerald Ford's pardon of Richard Nixon in 1974, which was controversial but aimed at national healing. In contrast, Trump's action appears more personal and divisive. "This isn't healing; it's hubris," said presidential historian Michael Beschloss. "It tests the boundaries of what the framers intended for the pardon power."

For Maxwell, the pardon represents a dramatic reversal of fortune. Currently incarcerated at a low-security federal prison in Florida, she could be released within days if paperwork is expedited. Her legal team has already filed motions for her release, expressing gratitude to Trump for "righting a wrong." Maxwell herself has not commented publicly, but sources close to her say she plans to relocate to a undisclosed location abroad to rebuild her life.

The Epstein-Maxwell saga, once thought buried with Epstein's death and Maxwell's conviction, is now thrust back into the spotlight. Victims' advocates vow to continue their fight, emphasizing that no pardon can erase the trauma inflicted. "We survived Epstein and Maxwell; we'll survive this too," said one anonymous victim in a statement. As Trump navigates the fallout, this pardon could define his second term, symbolizing either unchecked power or a necessary correction in a flawed system—depending on one's perspective.

The decision also intersects with ongoing investigations into Epstein's network. Federal authorities have unsealed more documents in recent months, revealing connections to other prominent figures in finance, entertainment, and politics. While Trump's pardon halts Maxwell's imprisonment, it may inadvertently fuel calls for deeper probes into those untouched by the scandal.

In the end, this pardon underscores the enduring tensions in American politics: the clash between executive authority and public accountability, the lingering shadows of scandal, and the quest for justice in a divided nation. As reactions continue to pour in, one thing is clear—the story of Ghislaine Maxwell, Jeffrey Epstein, and now Donald Trump is far from over. (Word count: 1,248)

Read the Full CNN Article at:
[ https://www.cnn.com/2025/07/28/politics/pardon-ghislaine-maxwell-trump-epstein ]