N@N

Carbon Capture Is More Expensive Than Just Switching To Renewables

The article from MSN discusses the economic and environmental considerations of carbon capture technology versus transitioning to renewable energy sources. It highlights that while carbon capture and storage (CCS) technology aims to mitigate climate change by capturing carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuel power plants and storing it underground, it is significantly more expensive than simply switching to renewable energy alternatives like wind and solar. The piece points out that the costs associated with CCS include not only the initial setup but also the ongoing expenses for operation and maintenance, which can make electricity from fossil fuels with CCS more costly than from renewables. Furthermore, the article notes that renewable energy technologies have seen dramatic cost reductions over the past decade, making them increasingly competitive. It argues that investing in renewable energy could be more beneficial in terms of cost, scalability, and long-term environmental impact, suggesting that CCS might be less of a silver bullet for climate change than previously thought.

Read the Full MSN Article at:
[ https://www.msn.com/en-us/science/environmental-science/carbon-capture-is-more-expensive-than-just-switching-to-renewables/ar-AA1zdOfa ]