N※N

Affirmative action beyond jobs: Why HC upheld 1994 quota for SC/ST bidders in PSU transport contracts

In a significant ruling, the Punjab and Haryana High Court recently upheld a 1994 policy by the Haryana government that provides a quota for Scheduled Castes (SC) and Scheduled Tribes (ST) bidders in public sector undertaking (PSU) transport contracts. This decision underscores the broader scope of affirmative action, extending beyond traditional employment reservations to include economic opportunities in government contracts. The court's reasoning and the implications of this judgment reflect a nuanced understanding of social justice, aiming to address historical disadvantages faced by marginalized communities in India through innovative policy measures.

The policy in question, introduced by the Haryana government in 1994, reserves a certain percentage of transport contracts for SC and ST bidders in PSUs. Specifically, it pertains to contracts for the transportation of goods and materials, a sector where marginalized communities have historically had limited access due to systemic barriers such as lack of capital, networks, and institutional support. The policy was challenged in court by petitioners who argued that such reservations were discriminatory and violated principles of equality under the Indian Constitution. They contended that affirmative action should be confined to education and employment, as traditionally understood under Articles 15(4) and 16(4) of the Constitution, which empower the state to make special provisions for the advancement of SCs, STs, and Other Backward Classes (OBCs).

However, the Punjab and Haryana High Court rejected these arguments, emphasizing that affirmative action is not limited to jobs or education but can extend to other areas where systemic inequalities persist. The court reasoned that the objective of reservations is to ensure substantive equality, not merely formal equality. Substantive equality recognizes that historically disadvantaged groups may require differential treatment to achieve a level playing field. In this context, the court found that providing quotas in PSU transport contracts was a legitimate exercise of state power to uplift SC and ST communities by enabling their participation in economic activities that have long been inaccessible to them.

The judgment delves into the historical context of caste-based discrimination in India, acknowledging that SC and ST communities have faced exclusion not only in education and employment but also in economic spheres such as trade, commerce, and entrepreneurship. The court noted that access to government contracts, which often involve substantial financial transactions and long-term business opportunities, can serve as a critical tool for economic empowerment. By reserving a portion of these contracts for SC and ST bidders, the state is addressing a structural barrier that prevents these communities from entering and thriving in such sectors. The policy, therefore, aligns with the constitutional mandate to promote social, economic, and political justice as enshrined in the Preamble and the Directive Principles of State Policy.

Furthermore, the court highlighted that the policy does not unduly prejudice other bidders. It pointed out that the reservation is not absolute; it operates within a framework that ensures merit and competence are not entirely sidelined. For instance, SC and ST bidders must still meet certain eligibility criteria and demonstrate their ability to fulfill the contractual obligations. The reservation merely provides them with a preferential opportunity to compete for contracts, rather than guaranteeing success. This balance, the court argued, is essential to ensure that affirmative action policies do not devolve into reverse discrimination or undermine the efficiency of public services.

The ruling also draws on broader jurisprudential principles surrounding affirmative action in India. The court referenced landmark Supreme Court judgments that have expanded the scope of reservations over the years. For example, it cited cases where the apex court has upheld reservations in promotions and other non-traditional areas, provided they are backed by data demonstrating the underrepresentation of marginalized groups. In the present case, the Haryana government presented evidence of the negligible participation of SC and ST individuals in the transport contract sector prior to the introduction of the 1994 policy. This data bolstered the state’s argument that the quota was a necessary intervention to correct a historical imbalance.

Critics of the policy, as noted in the judgment, raised concerns about the potential for inefficiency and corruption in the allocation of contracts under a quota system. They argued that prioritizing caste over merit could lead to substandard service delivery in the transport sector, ultimately harming public interest. However, the court dismissed these apprehensions, asserting that the state has mechanisms in place to monitor the performance of contractors and ensure accountability. It also emphasized that the policy is subject to periodic review, allowing the government to make adjustments if unintended consequences arise.

The broader implications of this judgment are profound, as it sets a precedent for extending affirmative action into new domains. While reservations in education and government jobs have been the cornerstone of India’s social justice framework, economic exclusion remains a persistent challenge for marginalized communities. The court’s endorsement of quotas in PSU contracts signals a recognition that economic empowerment is as critical as access to education and employment in breaking the cycle of caste-based disadvantage. This approach could inspire other states and the central government to explore similar policies in sectors like procurement, infrastructure, and small-scale industries, where marginalized groups are often underrepresented.

Moreover, the ruling reinforces the idea that affirmative action must evolve with changing socio-economic realities. As India progresses, the nature of inequality shifts, requiring innovative solutions that go beyond traditional reservation models. The court’s decision reflects a forward-thinking interpretation of the Constitution, one that prioritizes the spirit of equality over rigid adherence to conventional boundaries of affirmative action. It also serves as a reminder that the state has a proactive role to play in dismantling systemic barriers, whether they manifest in the labor market, educational institutions, or economic opportunities like government contracts.

The judgment also touches on the intersection of caste and economic class, acknowledging that while caste remains a primary axis of discrimination in India, it often overlaps with economic deprivation. SC and ST communities are disproportionately represented among the poor, and their exclusion from economic opportunities perpetuates a vicious cycle of poverty and marginalization. By facilitating access to transport contracts, the policy not only addresses caste-based exclusion but also provides a pathway for economic mobility. This dual focus on social and economic justice is a key takeaway from the court’s reasoning.

In conclusion, the Punjab and Haryana High Court’s decision to uphold the 1994 quota for SC and ST bidders in PSU transport contracts is a landmark ruling that broadens the scope of affirmative action in India. It recognizes that the fight for equality extends beyond jobs and education to include economic opportunities that have historically been out of reach for marginalized communities. By affirming the state’s authority to implement such policies, the court has paved the way for more inclusive economic frameworks that address the structural inequalities embedded in Indian society. This judgment is not just a legal victory for the policy’s beneficiaries but also a powerful statement on the evolving nature of social justice in a diverse and complex democracy like India. It challenges policymakers, jurists, and citizens alike to rethink the contours of affirmative action and consider how best to ensure that the promise of equality enshrined in the Constitution translates into tangible outcomes for those who have been historically left behind.

Read the Full ThePrint Article at:
[ https://theprint.in/judiciary/affirmative-action-beyond-jobs-why-hc-upheld-1994-quota-for-sc-st-bidders-in-psu-transport-contracts/2693068/ ]